Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[0.15] Final to-do's for 0.15.0 release notes #11280

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

[0.15] Final to-do's for 0.15.0 release notes #11280

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

meshcollider
Copy link
Contributor

@meshcollider meshcollider commented Sep 7, 2017

Closes #11174

I may have missed things that should be included, happy to amend :)

@laanwj laanwj added the Docs label Sep 7, 2017
@laanwj
Copy link
Member

laanwj commented Sep 7, 2017

Concept ACK
(never mind the travis fail, I cancelled travis here to save resources)

Rescanning with encrypted wallets
---------------------------------

When using an encrypted HD wallet, the keypool cannot be topped up without unlocking the wallet. This means that
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

might want to note this is not a regression, right?


Version 0.15.0 supports adding a segregated witness address via the `addwitnessaddress` RPC, but
please note that this is a testing/expert RPC, which does not guarantee recovery from backup. Only use
this RPC if you know what you are doing. More complete support for segregated witness, including
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"including wallet support" sounds like there are other things missing. It's the only thing...


When using an encrypted HD wallet, the keypool cannot be topped up without unlocking the wallet. This means that
currently, in order to recover from a backup of an encrypted HD wallet, the user must unlock the wallet with a
really long time out and manually trigger a rescan with `-rescan`, otherwise they risk missing some keys when
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rescan rpc (or command in the gui debug console). ... if you restart with -rescan you'll be relocked!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oops, fixed, thanks

@fanquake fanquake added this to the 0.15.0 milestone Sep 7, 2017
@instagibbs
Copy link
Member

instagibbs commented Sep 7, 2017 via email

Notes for 0.15.0
================

Current SegWit Support
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit s/Support/support

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed, although title capitalisation is a bit inconsistent already in the file

Version 0.15.0 supports adding a segregated witness address via the `addwitnessaddress` RPC, but
please note that this is a testing/expert RPC, which does not guarantee recovery from backup. Only use
this RPC if you know what you are doing. More complete wallet support for segregated witness is coming
in a next version.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this going to be in a point release, or 0.16.0 ? I think we should mention which here, because one could be a month away, while the other is 6 months or more. If not, instead of "is coming in a next version.", maybe just "will be available shortly." ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Segwit wallet support is aimed for 0.15.1 I believe? Also to me, "will be available shortly." sounds like it will somehow be added to 0.15.0, I like the emphasis on the new version

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

meshcollider is correct.


As in previous versions, when using an encrypted HD wallet, the keypool cannot be topped up without unlocking
the wallet. This means that currently, in order to recover from a backup of an encrypted HD wallet, the user
must unlock the wallet with a really long time out and manually trigger a rescan, otherwise they risk missing
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

time out => timeout

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed

@instagibbs
Copy link
Member

Travis needs a kick post #11271 I think

ACK 8323db6

@sipa
Copy link
Member

sipa commented Sep 8, 2017

ACK; needs rebase to fix travis

@laanwj
Copy link
Member

laanwj commented Sep 10, 2017

This has missed the 0.15.0 final tag, forgot about this one, sorry!

@laanwj
Copy link
Member

laanwj commented Sep 10, 2017

Keeping this open for now, I'll see if I can still include this in the release notes uploaded to bitcoin.org etc.

@dooglus
Copy link
Contributor

dooglus commented Sep 12, 2017

maximumCount - a number specifying the minimum number of UTXOs

This seems wrong. Doc string says:

      "maximumCount"     (numeric or string, default=unlimited) **Maximum** number of UTXOs

@laanwj
Copy link
Member

laanwj commented Sep 14, 2017

Closing, this is now part of the 0.15.0 release notes on master.

This seems wrong. Doc string says:

Did not see this remark soon enough, so could not take this into account.

@laanwj laanwj closed this Sep 14, 2017
@meshcollider meshcollider deleted the 201709_release_note_015_todo branch September 14, 2017 13:18
@bitcoin bitcoin locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 8, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

8 participants