Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Report 'neverseen' TXs: the number of TXs in block, but not memory pool #1652

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jgarzik
Copy link
Contributor

@jgarzik jgarzik commented Aug 2, 2012

This statistic is only reported when a new block appends onto the
strongest chain.

Tested by comparing bitcoind new-block results with pynode, which performs a similar calculation.

This statistic is only reported when a new block appends onto the
strongest chain.
@gmaxwell
Copy link
Contributor

gmaxwell commented Aug 3, 2012

Is this useful? IIRC a number of pools mine their own payouts. I expect it to mostly measure that.

@TheBlueMatt
Copy link
Contributor

Would be useful to measure the potential impact of forwarding blocks as header + vector instead of header + vector

@BitcoinPullTester
Copy link

The following is an automatic comment from the Bitcoin Pull Tester.
If you believe it is in error, please contact jenkins@bluematt.me

This pull passed automatic sanity-tests!
This means it merges cleanly onto current master, builds and unit-tests pass
You can find the test log and build output at http://jenkins.bluematt.me/pull-tester/561ae122b7bc9d0b3b7a565767371a24a6514768

@jgarzik
Copy link
Contributor Author

jgarzik commented Aug 17, 2012

no ACKs gathered, closing

@jgarzik jgarzik closed this Aug 17, 2012
@jgarzik jgarzik deleted the neverseen branch August 24, 2014 04:24
suprnurd pushed a commit to chaincoin-legacy/chaincoin that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2017
@bitcoin bitcoin locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 8, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants