doc: Correct spelling errors in comments

[Empact]

And ci script output.

Identified via test/lint/lint-spelling

Before:

$ test/lint/lint-spelling.sh 
ci/test/05_before_script.sh:29: explicitely  ==> explicitly
src/compressor.h:43: Ser  ==> Set
src/compressor.h:78: Ser  ==> Set
src/logging/timer.h:88: outputing  ==> outputting
src/node/psbt.cpp:87: minumum  ==> minimum
src/qt/coincontroldialog.cpp:372: UnSelect  ==> deselect
src/qt/coincontroldialog.cpp:443: unselect  ==> deselect
src/qt/coincontroldialog.cpp:448: UnSelect  ==> deselect
src/qt/coincontroldialog.cpp:699: UnSelect  ==> deselect
src/serialize.h:211: Ser  ==> Set
src/serialize.h:213: Ser  ==> Set
src/serialize.h:228: Ser  ==> Set
src/serialize.h:246: Ser  ==> Set
src/serialize.h:484: Ser  ==> Set
src/serialize.h:490: Ser  ==> Set
src/serialize.h:510: Ser  ==> Set
src/serialize.h:622: Ser  ==> Set
src/serialize.h:740: Ser  ==> Set
src/test/base32_tests.cpp:14: fo  ==> of, for
src/test/base64_tests.cpp:14: fo  ==> of, for
src/txmempool.h:756: incomaptible  ==> incompatible
src/undo.h:26: Ser  ==> Set
src/wallet/coincontrol.h:74: UnSelect  ==> deselect
test/functional/feature_backwards_compatibility.py:116: Abondon  ==> Abandon
test/functional/rpc_getaddressinfo_label_deprecation.py:7: superceded  ==> superseded
test/lint/lint-shell.sh:44: desriptor  ==> descriptor
^ Warning: codespell identified likely spelling errors. Any false positives? Add them to the list of ignored words in test/lint/lint-spelling.ignore-words.txt

After:

$ test/lint/lint-spelling.sh 
src/test/base32_tests.cpp:14: fo  ==> of, for
src/test/base64_tests.cpp:14: fo  ==> of, for
test/functional/rpc_getaddressinfo_label_deprecation.py:7: superceded  ==> superseded
^ Warning: codespell identified likely spelling errors. Any false positives? Add them to the list of ignored words in test/lint/lint-spelling.ignore-words.txt

[maflcko]

ACK 9b0e162

[DrahtBot]

The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.

Conflicts

Reviewers, this pull request conflicts with the following ones:

• txmempool: split epoch logic into class #18017 (txmempool: split epoch logic into class by ajtowns)

If you consider this pull request important, please also help to review the conflicting pull requests. Ideally, start with the one that should be merged first.

[practicalswift]

ACK 9b0e162