Decrease COIN_DUST to 0.001 BTC, Update TX miner and relay fee defaults #2100

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into
from

Conversation

Projects
None yet
4 participants
@jgarzik
Contributor

jgarzik commented Dec 12, 2012

  1. Create COIN_DUST constant, to represent the dust spam limit used.

  2. Decrease COIN_DUST to 0.001 BTC

Rationale: With the increase in bitcoin value (US$13.67 as of this writing), it seems reasonable to reduce the value level of which we consider "dust spam."

  1. Update TX miner and relay fee defaults to 0.001 / 0.0005 BTC respectively

Rationale: Reflects growth of dust spam in unspent transaction output dataset.

Jeff Garzik added some commits Dec 12, 2012

Jeff Garzik Jeff Garzik
Decrease COIN_DUST to 0.001 BTC
With the increase in bitcoin value (US$13.67 as of this writing), it seems
reasonable to reduce the level of which we consider "dust spam."
Jeff Garzik Jeff Garzik
Update TX miner and relay fee defaults to 0.001 / 0.0005 BTC respecti…
…vely

Reflects growth of dust spam in unspent transaction output dataset.
@luke-jr

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@luke-jr

luke-jr Dec 13, 2012

Member

$13 is a decrease from a previous $25, which used 0.01 BTC COIN_DUST-equivalent just fine.

Member

luke-jr commented Dec 13, 2012

$13 is a decrease from a previous $25, which used 0.01 BTC COIN_DUST-equivalent just fine.

@gmaxwell

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@gmaxwell

gmaxwell Dec 14, 2012

Member

Meh. Lets have some offline discussion. Having a back and forth argument in a pull request isn't going to be as productive as chatting on IRC some, when I think there is probably already agreement on this even if we don't know it yet.

Member

gmaxwell commented Dec 14, 2012

Meh. Lets have some offline discussion. Having a back and forth argument in a pull request isn't going to be as productive as chatting on IRC some, when I think there is probably already agreement on this even if we don't know it yet.

@BitcoinPullTester

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@BitcoinPullTester

BitcoinPullTester Dec 16, 2012

Automatic sanity-testing: PASSED, see http://jenkins.bluematt.me/pull-tester/477acd1a11e238caf30c180c623f0999de26a2ac for binaries and test log.

Automatic sanity-testing: PASSED, see http://jenkins.bluematt.me/pull-tester/477acd1a11e238caf30c180c623f0999de26a2ac for binaries and test log.

@luke-jr

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@luke-jr

luke-jr Dec 16, 2012

Member

FWIW, I wasn't actually making an argument against the pullreq, just posting a (devil's advocate style) comment.

Member

luke-jr commented Dec 16, 2012

FWIW, I wasn't actually making an argument against the pullreq, just posting a (devil's advocate style) comment.

@BitcoinPullTester

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@BitcoinPullTester

BitcoinPullTester Jan 24, 2013

Automatic sanity-testing: PASSED, see http://jenkins.bluematt.me/pull-tester/477acd1a11e238caf30c180c623f0999de26a2ac for binaries and test log.

Automatic sanity-testing: PASSED, see http://jenkins.bluematt.me/pull-tester/477acd1a11e238caf30c180c623f0999de26a2ac for binaries and test log.

@jgarzik

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@jgarzik

jgarzik Apr 26, 2013

Contributor

Superceded by #2577

Contributor

jgarzik commented Apr 26, 2013

Superceded by #2577

@jgarzik jgarzik closed this Apr 26, 2013

@jgarzik jgarzik deleted the jgarzik:dust branch Aug 24, 2014

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment