fuzz: Speed up transaction fuzz target #22004
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
|
|
cr ACK bbbb518: patch looks correct, and |
sidhujag
pushed a commit
to syscoin/syscoin
that referenced
this pull request
May 21, 2021
bbbb518 fuzz: Speed up transaction fuzz target (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: `hashBlock` and `include_addresses` are orthogonal, so no need to do an exhaustive "search". Might fix https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=34491 ACKs for top commit: practicalswift: cr ACK bbbb518: patch looks correct, and `TxToUniv` surprisingly wide in the `transaction_fuzz_target` flame graph! Putting it on a diet makes sense. Tree-SHA512: 1e7c30c7fecf96364a9a1597c0a22139389fdeb67db59f3c2c6fc088196e3332877b2865991a957980d542f99a2f48cc066dd7cc16c695a5113190fe06205089
gwillen
pushed a commit
to ElementsProject/elements
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 1, 2022
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
hashBlockandinclude_addressesare orthogonal, so no need to do an exhaustive "search".Might fix https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=34491