ci: remove RUN_SECURITY_TESTS
#27683
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
We no-longer run any security/syymbol checks in the CI, and doubt we will in future (if we do, it'll be via Guix, where this var would be redundant in any case). The CI environment doesn't (exactly) match the release build environment (and is semi-regularly changing), and the binaries produced in the CI don't match how we build release binaries, so there is no point trying to run these checks, especially as we add more involved tests, i.e bitcoin#26953.
|
The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers. ReviewsSee the guideline for information on the review process.
If your review is incorrectly listed, please react with 👎 to this comment and the bot will ignore it on the next update. |
This was referenced May 17, 2023
Merged
Concept ACK on that. |
|
code review ACK 6a93658 +1 on removing "off by default" stuff from the CI scripts. also agree that guix is the right place to be handling these sorts of checks |
TheCharlatan
approved these changes
May 20, 2023
sidhujag
pushed a commit
to syscoin/syscoin
that referenced
this pull request
May 23, 2023
6a93658 ci: remove RUN_SECURITY_TESTS (fanquake) Pull request description: We no-longer run any security/symbol checks in the CI, and doubt we will in future (if we do, it'll be via Guix, where this var would be redundant in any case). The CI environment doesn't (exactly) match the release build environment (and is semi-regularly changing), and the binaries produced in the CI don't match how we build release binaries, so there is no point trying to run these checks, especially as we add more involved tests, i.e bitcoin#26953. ACKs for top commit: josibake: code review ACK bitcoin@6a93658 TheCharlatan: ACK 6a93658 Tree-SHA512: c0eec61a4b873bac487ba9321b50116a215b4796bd7d416d98ffcd09969dbf635c2cb5aeb225c89d1e6462838fa2a48565048ebe730f48d76d3db46b64855a91
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We no-longer run any security/symbol checks in the CI, and doubt we will in future (if we do, it'll be via Guix, where this var would be redundant in any case). The CI environment doesn't (exactly) match the release build environment (and is semi-regularly changing), and the binaries produced in the CI don't match how we build release binaries, so there is no point trying to run these checks, especially as we add more involved tests, i.e #26953.