Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

wallet: fix key parsing check for miniscript expressions #29027

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 21, 2023

Conversation

brunoerg
Copy link
Contributor

@brunoerg brunoerg commented Dec 8, 2023

In ParseScript, when processing miniscript expressions, the way we check for key parsing error is wrong, the actual code is unreachable because we're checking it into if (node) (successful parsing) statement.

@DrahtBot
Copy link
Contributor

DrahtBot commented Dec 8, 2023

The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.

Code Coverage

For detailed information about the code coverage, see the test coverage report.

Reviews

See the guideline for information on the review process.

Type Reviewers
ACK sipa, RandyMcMillan, achow101

If your review is incorrectly listed, please react with 👎 to this comment and the bot will ignore it on the next update.

Conflicts

Reviewers, this pull request conflicts with the following ones:

  • #22838 (descriptors: Be able to specify change and receiving in a single descriptor string by achow101)

If you consider this pull request important, please also help to review the conflicting pull requests. Ideally, start with the one that should be merged first.

@sipa
Copy link
Member

sipa commented Dec 20, 2023

utACK e1281f1

@RandyMcMillan
Copy link
Contributor

utACK e1281f1

@achow101
Copy link
Member

ACK e1281f1

@DrahtBot DrahtBot removed the request for review from achow101 December 21, 2023 16:57
@achow101 achow101 merged commit eefe4ba into bitcoin:master Dec 21, 2023
16 checks passed
luke-jr pushed a commit to bitcoinknots/bitcoin that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants