Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "ci: Only run functional tests on windows in master" #29059

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 12, 2023

Conversation

hebasto
Copy link
Member

@hebasto hebasto commented Dec 12, 2023

This PR reverts commit aba4a58 from #28567.

The Windows-specific code received quality and performance improvements recently. So there are no reasons to skip functional tests in PRs anymore.

In my own repo, I've run the GHA Windows job more than 100 times with no failure.

@DrahtBot
Copy link
Contributor

DrahtBot commented Dec 12, 2023

The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.

Code Coverage

For detailed information about the code coverage, see the test coverage report.

Reviews

See the guideline for information on the review process.

Type Reviewers
ACK maflcko, TheCharlatan

If your review is incorrectly listed, please react with 👎 to this comment and the bot will ignore it on the next update.

if: github.event_name != 'pull_request'
run: py -3 test\functional\test_runner.py --jobs $env:NUMBER_OF_PROCESSORS --ci --quiet --tmpdirprefix=$env:RUNNER_TEMP --combinedlogslen=99999999 --timeout-factor=$env:TEST_RUNNER_TIMEOUT_FACTOR --extended
env:
TEST_RUNNER_EXTRA: ${{ github.event_name != 'pull_request' && '--extended' || '' }}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How much longer would it take to also run --extended?

Copy link
Member Author

@hebasto hebasto Dec 12, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How much longer would it take to also run --extended?

Appr. extra 10 minutes.

The feature_dbcrash.py test takes the longest time.

@maflcko
Copy link
Member

maflcko commented Dec 12, 2023

lgtm ACK 7b22cd8

Copy link
Contributor

@TheCharlatan TheCharlatan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK 7b22cd8

@fanquake fanquake merged commit a7484be into bitcoin:master Dec 12, 2023
16 checks passed
@hebasto hebasto deleted the 231212-msvc-revert branch December 12, 2023 13:51
@fanquake
Copy link
Member

Looks like these are still just randomly failing: #29090 ?

@hebasto
Copy link
Member Author

hebasto commented Dec 15, 2023

Looks like these are still just randomly failing: #29090 ?

Perhaps, it depends on the image version? That one was 20231211.1.0.

@fanquake
Copy link
Member

I don't think so. The last run on master passed with that image version: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/actions/runs/7214949583/job/19658167262.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants