Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fuzz: actually test garbage >64b in p2p transport test #29667

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 19, 2024

Conversation

sipa
Copy link
Member

@sipa sipa commented Mar 17, 2024

This fixes an oversight from #28196: in the p2p_transport_bidirectional_v2 fuzz test, when the desired garbage length is over 64 bytes, the code would actually use garbage length 0. Fix this.

@DrahtBot
Copy link
Contributor

DrahtBot commented Mar 17, 2024

The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.

Code Coverage

For detailed information about the code coverage, see the test coverage report.

Reviews

See the guideline for information on the review process.

Type Reviewers
ACK instagibbs, brunoerg

If your review is incorrectly listed, please react with 👎 to this comment and the bot will ignore it on the next update.

Conflicts

Reviewers, this pull request conflicts with the following ones:

  • #29625 (Several randomness improvements by sipa)

If you consider this pull request important, please also help to review the conflicting pull requests. Ideally, start with the one that should be merged first.

@instagibbs
Copy link
Member

ACK 626f8e3

Copy link
Member

@maflcko maflcko left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Copy link
Contributor

@brunoerg brunoerg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

crACK 626f8e3

@fanquake fanquake merged commit 0f89e86 into bitcoin:master Mar 19, 2024
16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants