Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enable mempool consistency checks in unit tests #8222

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 22, 2016

Conversation

sipa
Copy link
Member

@sipa sipa commented Jun 18, 2016

This helped me discovered #8220.

I can't measure any slowdown for running the unit tests.

@petertodd
Copy link
Contributor

Concept ACK

@maflcko maflcko added the Tests label Jun 19, 2016
@maflcko
Copy link
Member

maflcko commented Jun 19, 2016

utACK 3775ff9

@gmaxwell
Copy link
Contributor

Tested ACK. Just a very slight reservation that perhaps a consistency check being enabled someday hides a bug.

@laanwj
Copy link
Member

laanwj commented Jun 20, 2016

Sounds like a good idea to me, concept ACK.

Just a very slight reservation that perhaps a consistency check being enabled someday hides a bug.

This just adds checks I, hope? It doesn't ever correct consistency?

@laanwj laanwj merged commit 3775ff9 into bitcoin:master Jun 22, 2016
laanwj added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 22, 2016
3775ff9 Enable mempool consistency checks in unit tests (Pieter Wuille)
codablock pushed a commit to codablock/dash that referenced this pull request Dec 28, 2017
3775ff9 Enable mempool consistency checks in unit tests (Pieter Wuille)
andvgal pushed a commit to energicryptocurrency/gen2-energi that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2019
3775ff9 Enable mempool consistency checks in unit tests (Pieter Wuille)
@bitcoin bitcoin locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 8, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants