Voting/Polls support

[naim94a]

Would be nice if Bluesky added Vote/Poll support, unlike twitter - all votes would be public (unless there's a reasonable way to keep them private).

[bnewbold]

This idea is on our radar! It is also something that 3rd parties could potentially do as an extension or independent lexicon. In fact, it would make a great demonstration of how the Lexicon system works 🤔.

[pfrazee]

We haven't introduced the mechanisms for schema negotiation yet and we also don't have a great story around lexicon hosting, so while a 3p client could do this it might be a little premature (more difficult than if we held off).

[MarkBennett]

Would that mean the next step on moving this forward would be adding it to the AT protocol. How would someone move that forward? Is there an RFC process?

[TheTopMostDog]

I'd be stoked to see polls include options for 6 or even 8 choices, as well as the choice of check boxes (and/or/all) alongside traditional radio buttons (mutually exclusive/or-only). Being stuck with strawpoll and the like just because microblog platforms don't flesh out their polls the way they should is a shame, and less streamlined than it should be.

Oh, and give us a "view results" button instead of having to sacrifice one of the options for people who just wanna click through (to stop them clicking just anything, it's important to dedicate an option to "abstain" on platforms that don't offer show results). Then, let the poll author choose whether a user can vote after seeing the results, or if skipping forces them to abstain (useful for popularity votes).

👍👍😆

[Tamschi]

In terms of UX, it would be a good idea to have a look at WhatsApp's polls (in groups), I think.
They communicate very clearly that they aren't anonymous, and they also allow users to revoke votes.
(I'm much less of a fan of them using circular check boxes also for multiple-choice polls though.)

Here's a good walkthrough that shows everything but the detailed vote list: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mg6nTim1xXk

I think that revocable votes are a necessary consequence of votes being public, and I think allowing users to reconsider should be fine too.
The AppView can still make an (anonymous) snapshot of the tallies at the preset end time, or even chart them over time in regular intervals.

[DavidBuchanan314]

Discord also does non-anonymous polls, although they don't do an amazing job of communicating the non-anonymity. There's a button to see who voted for what, which makes it pretty explicit, but the button itself isn't very visible (in classic modern interface design fashion, it doesn't even look like a button, it's just text that happens to be clickable). They also let you un-vote.

[bslade]

A long long time ago, as a techie, I implemented a guerilla write-in poll app for America Online (not budgeted or coordinated with the business managers, using spare H/W that my sys admin buddies let me use). Poll choices were displayed with most votes at the top. I would seed it with some initial choices. Users would then write-in their choices and vote for them. Usually the first page or so of choices added were the only ones that would get significant votes. Even if really pithy choices were added later on, nobody would scroll down to look at them. Really what's needed is a discussion/nomination time with the results of the discussion used as input by a moderator to create the initial poll.

It was fun. Usually a snarky choice would rise to the top (eg., "Your mama" for president)

Also, even back then (2002?), some of the political polls were taken over by fervent libertarian types.

One problem with the AOL authentication system, users could change their screen names (the unique user identifier) which allowed them to game the poll app.

Eventually, upper management (Ted Leonsis I think) found this weird unbudgeted thing and had it cancelled (Telling me me to stick to my regular work)

I'm researching the AT Protocol to see what would be involved with implementing something similar.