Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix skema default value when create new struct #3

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 23, 2024

Conversation

bluzky
Copy link
Owner

@bluzky bluzky commented Mar 23, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced default value handling for data schema definitions.
  • Tests
    • Added tests for new default value functionality in schema construction.
  • Chores
    • Updated project version to 0.2.1.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 23, 2024

Walkthrough

This update introduces a function to manage default values in schema definitions, streamlines the process of setting up default values during schema construction, and includes a version bump. Additionally, it adds a comprehensive test suite for the defschema module, ensuring that instance creation with default values and their ability to be overridden are properly validated.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
lib/schema.ex Introduced __default_value__ for default value handling in schema definitions. Updated defstruct declaration.
mix.exs Updated project version from "0.2.0" to "0.2.1".
test/.../defschema_test.exs Added tests for instance creation with default values and overrides in defschema.

🐰✨
In the realm of code, where schemas align,
A rabbit hopped forth, with a plan so divine.
"Let defaults be set, with ease and grace,
And versions tick up, in this digital space."
With tests to ensure, that all would behave,
This rabbit’s work, truly bold and brave.
🌟📚

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@bluzky bluzky merged commit d787c62 into main Mar 23, 2024
1 check passed
@bluzky bluzky deleted the hotfix/fix-new-schema-with-default-not-work branch March 23, 2024 14:58
Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @bluzky - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

General suggestions:

  • Consider adding more comprehensive tests to cover edge cases, such as default functions with side effects.
  • Review the documentation to ensure it clearly explains how to use dynamic default values.
Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟢 General issues: all looks good
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Docstrings: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 12bf549 and 109528d.
Files selected for processing (3)
  • lib/schema.ex (1 hunks)
  • mix.exs (1 hunks)
  • test/defschema_test.exs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • mix.exs
Additional comments: 3
test/defschema_test.exs (2)
  • 6-20: The tests for defschema User with default values and their overrides are well-structured and cover the basic functionality of creating instances with default values and overriding them. However, it's important to ensure that edge cases, such as providing invalid types for fields or missing required fields, are also tested to guarantee robustness.

Consider adding tests for edge cases, such as providing invalid types for fields or missing required fields, to ensure the robustness of the schema validation and default value application.

  • 21-21: The tests under Skema.cast_and_validate cover a wide range of scenarios, including casting and validating embedded types, handling arrays of schemas, and dealing with invalid data. These tests are crucial for ensuring the reliability of the schema casting and validation mechanisms.

Great job covering a wide range of scenarios in the Skema.cast_and_validate tests. This comprehensive testing ensures the reliability of the schema casting and validation mechanisms.

lib/schema.ex (1)
  • 250-267: The introduction of the __default_value__ function and its integration into the schema definition process is a significant enhancement for handling default values. This change allows for more flexible and robust default value management. However, it's important to ensure that the function handles all possible types of default values correctly, including literals, functions, and potentially complex data structures.

Ensure comprehensive testing of the __default_value__ function to cover all possible types of default values, including literals, functions, and complex data structures. This will help guarantee the robustness of default value handling.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant