-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Technical Support] LPS-85875 Do not delete the structure if it belongs to a different group #64678
Conversation
CI is automatically triggering "ci:test:sf" and "ci:test:relevant" for this pull to run Source Formatter and relevant tests. Comment "ci:test" to run the full PR Tester for this pull. |
/cc @natocesarrego |
✔️ ci:test:sf - 1 out of 1 jobs passed in 2 minutes 4 seconds 8 msClick here for more details.Base Branch:Branch Name: master Sender Branch:Branch Name: pr-905 1 Successful Jobs:For more details click here. |
The pull request tester is still running.Please wait until you get the final report before running 'ci:retest'. See this link to check on the status of your test: However, the pull request was closed.The pull request was closed because the following critical batches had failed: For information as to why we automatically close out certain pull requests see this article. *This pull will no longer automatically close if this comment is available. If you believe this is a mistake please reopen this pull by entering the following command as a comment. ci:reopen Critical Failure Details:test-portal-acceptance-pullrequest-batch(master)/modules-semantic-versioning-jdk8Job Results:0 Tests Passed.
cc @jpince
|
ci:reopen |
❌ ci:test:relevant - 20 out of 23 jobs passed in 1 hour 17 minutes 41 seconds 987 msClick here for more details.Base Branch:Branch Name: master Copied in Private Modules Branch:Branch Name: master-private 3 Failed Jobs:20 Successful Jobs:
For more details click here.Failures unique to this pull:
Failures in common with acceptance upstream results at 5fea897:
|
ci:test:relevant |
Please send a backport to support like our normal support workflow. Merged into master only. Thank you. |
Hi @rafaprax,
I just reviewed this pull request and it looks good to me. If you need any clarification, please ask @robertoDiaz.
Thanks.