2017 ... #3
Comments
|
Hi there, For now this project is using VS2015 with CUDA 8. Thanks |
|
Okay sounds good. Ummm is it all automated in regards to when it corrlates a matching key... ?? i am running it on a x64 so started it from a different path...
Addionally i am unsure why v 0.0.4 worked as opposed to the more recent version where when loaded into VS would throw errors.
I assume its all cmd entry and loaded thru the keyfinder.exe not located in the root dir...
Other than that im good and appriciate you emailing me....
have you ever had a positive result as i am trying to recover my old wallet...nothing naferous ... just wondering if its ever worked which assume does on earlier wallets than after 2012 when mulisig came to be supported.
Its a nice build ..i respect your time into itThx
Mike
Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
-------- Original message --------From: brichard19 <notifications@github.com> Date: 5/22/18 6:21 PM (GMT-08:00) To: brichard19/BitCrack <BitCrack@noreply.github.com> Cc: mikejnpc <mikejnpc@gmail.com>, Author <author@noreply.github.com> Subject: Re: [brichard19/BitCrack] 2017 ... (#3)
Hi there,
For now this project is using VS2015 with CUDA 8.
Thanks
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
{"@context":"http://schema.org","@type":"EmailMessage","potentialAction":{"@type":"ViewAction","target":"https://github.com/brichard19/BitCrack/issues/3#issuecomment-391190347","url":"https://github.com/brichard19/BitCrack/issues/3#issuecomment-391190347","name":"View Issue"},"description":"View this Issue on GitHub","publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"GitHub","url":"https://github.com"}}
{"api_version":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/brichard19/BitCrack","title":"brichard19/BitCrack","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/17495839/a5054eac-5d88-11e6-95fc-7290892c7bb5.png","avatar_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/15842166/7c72db34-2c0b-11e6-9aed-b52498112777.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/brichard19/BitCrack"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@brichard19 in #3: Hi there,\r\n\r\nFor now this project is using VS2015 with CUDA 8. \r\n\r\nThanks"}],"action":{"name":"View Issue","url":"#3 (comment)"}}}
{
"@type": "MessageCard",
"@context": "http://schema.org/extensions",
"hideOriginalBody": "false",
"originator": "37567f93-e2a7-4e2a-ad37-a9160fc62647",
"title": "Re: [brichard19/BitCrack] 2017 ... (#3)",
"sections": [
{
"text": "",
"activityTitle": "**brichard19**",
"activityImage": "https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/15842166/7c72db34-2c0b-11e6-9aed-b52498112777.png",
"activitySubtitle": "@brichard19",
"facts": [
]
}
],
"potentialAction": [
{
"name": "Add a comment",
"@type": "ActionCard",
"inputs": [
{
"isMultiLine": true,
"@type": "TextInput",
"id": "IssueComment",
"isRequired": false
}
],
"actions": [
{
"name": "Comment",
"@type": "HttpPOST",
"target": "https://api.github.com",
"body": "{\n\"commandName\": \"IssueComment\",\n\"repositoryFullName\": \"brichard19/BitCrack\",\n\"issueId\": 3,\n\"IssueComment\": \"{{IssueComment.value}}\"\n}"
}
]
},
{
"name": "Close issue",
"@type": "HttpPOST",
"target": "https://api.github.com",
"body": "{\n\"commandName\": \"IssueClose\",\n\"repositoryFullName\": \"brichard19/BitCrack\",\n\"issueId\": 3\n}"
},
{
"targets": [
{
"os": "default",
"uri": "#3 (comment)"
}
],
"@type": "OpenUri",
"name": "View on GitHub"
},
{
"name": "Unsubscribe",
"@type": "HttpPOST",
"target": "https://api.github.com",
"body": "{\n\"commandName\": \"MuteNotification\",\n\"threadId\": 334556975\n}"
}
],
"themeColor": "26292E"
}
|
|
if you care to assist i wouldnt mind donating 1/3rd to your project
efforts.
everyone needs to eat ... :)
think it over.. cheers!
…On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 9:36 PM, mikejnpc ***@***.***> wrote:
Okay sounds good. Ummm is it all automated in regards to when it corrlates
a matching key... ?? i am running it on a x64 so started it from a
different path...
Addionally i am unsure why v 0.0.4 worked as opposed to the more recent
version where when loaded into VS would throw errors.
I assume its all cmd entry and loaded thru the keyfinder.exe not located
in the root dir...
Other than that im good and appriciate you emailing me....
have you ever had a positive result as i am trying to recover my old
wallet...nothing naferous ... just wondering if its ever worked which
assume does on earlier wallets than after 2012 when mulisig came to be
supported.
Its a nice build ..i respect your time into it
Thx
Mike
Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
-------- Original message --------
From: brichard19 ***@***.***>
Date: 5/22/18 6:21 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: brichard19/BitCrack ***@***.***>
Cc: mikejnpc ***@***.***>, Author ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [brichard19/BitCrack] 2017 ... (#3)
Hi there,
For now this project is using VS2015 with CUDA 8.
Thanks
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#3 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AlY7x0tw_BZPCaH1HevJ5NV-b6eNQMV1ks5t1LmygaJpZM4T8O8v>
.
|
|
Hi, Can you describe the problem you are having with loading the solution in VS? The project loads and builds fine on my system. In regards to your second question, the tool does have positive results. For instance, the address 12bahMGWAnSEYS3PKURvhScm8GmZhejY7t can be solved in under a minute. I have been testing against addresses I've generated using this tool (by specifying the secret exponent): https://brainwalletx.github.io/#generator. The AddrGen.exe tool produces the same output too. I'm afraid you will not be able to recover your old wallet with this tool, though. This is a brute-force tool designed to assist in solving the Bitcoin puzzle transactions: https://blockchain.info/tx/08389f34c98c606322740c0be6a7125d9860bb8d5cb182c02f98461e5fa6cd15 These private keys are in known ranges, and the most efficient method is brute force. Was your wallet password protected? It may be feasible to add in a password cracking feature. It's nice to know that people are using the project! |
|
richard, could you send me a email directly or jabber works too... same
nickname @yax.im
just dont want a bunch of stuff posted in a way where it inst controlled :)
thx for being so attentive and can discuss my problem and possible
solution,...
…On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 6:34 PM, brichard19 ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi,
Can you describe the problem you are having with loading the solution in
VS? The project loads and builds fine on my system.
In regards to your second question, the tool does have positive results.
For instance, the address 12bahMGWAnSEYS3PKURvhScm8GmZhejY7t can be
solved in under a minute.
I have been testing against addresses I've generated using this tool (by
specifying the secret exponent): https://brainwalletx.github.io/#generator.
The AddrGen.exe tool produces the same output too.
I'm afraid you will not be able to recover your old wallet with this tool,
though. This is a brute-force tool designed to assist in solving the
Bitcoin puzzle transactions: https://blockchain.info/tx/
08389f34c98c606322740c0be6a7125d9860bb8d5cb182c02f98461e5fa6cd15
. More details here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1306983.0.
These private keys are in known ranges, and the most efficient method is
brute force.
Was your wallet password protected? It may be feasible to add in a
password cracking feature.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#3 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AlY7xxsFg5x9rst0vZMtYN4eGNyj3aUqks5t11-KgaJpZM4T8O8v>
.
|
|
I today set up cuda 9.2 and vs 2017 in an hour. Everything was compiled without problems and works. |
|
Hi, That's great news! I'll look to transitioning to VS2017 and CUDA 9. Thanks |
|
Could we implement a timer into the initialization process? I have been trying so many different combinations of the parameters to try get the program to start faster and I can't figure it all out. It just says initialization... and sometimes after 12 hours its still saying that. |
Yes, everything is pretty simple, just change the properties of projects to 9.2 and obj everywhere. |
|
@adminnu Did it make the program run any better? |
![https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/17495839/a5054eac-5d88-11e6-95fc-7290892c7bb5.png","avatar_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/15842166/7c72db34-2c0b-11e6-9aed-b52498112777.png","action":{"name":"Open](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/17495839/a5054eac-5d88-11e6-95fc-7290892c7bb5.png","avatar_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/15842166/7c72db34-2c0b-11e6-9aed-b52498112777.png","action":{"name":"Open){kind=link}
does this run in 2017 VS? i see the errors being thrown for some of the sections...
so.. cuda 8 is not supported in vs2017 -- any help on this appreciated
and the keyloader lib failed to load...
-keyloader lib fail
-cuda math not present
which are interlinked.. not sure how to add cuda 8 or use cuda 9 instead.
---nvm instlalled 2015 cuda etc...but still unsure ,, email mikejnpc@protonmail.com thx,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: