You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Suppose you have a coordinate-sorted file foo.sam with multiple entries having the same read name and start coordinate (for whatever reason). Calling CompareSAMs foo.sam foo.sam will tell you that foo.sam differs from itself!
This is because the code currently assumes that we only have one entry for each read name at a given coordinate. Moreover, it traverses the "left" and "right" files asymmetrically, so that duplicate entries will get respected in one file but not the other.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
…e genomic start position. (#516)
Previously this would show up as "missing left" since the key was read-name and position and the first read would be overwritten by the second. Now I also include "first" or "second" in the key and this solves the problem.
- added a test that previously failed.
- fixed a test that was broken with fix. since the key now includes first/second in pair, it was needed that these match up between the two files for the test.
- resolves#160
- resolves#284
Suppose you have a coordinate-sorted file
foo.sam
with multiple entries having the same read name and start coordinate (for whatever reason). CallingCompareSAMs foo.sam foo.sam
will tell you thatfoo.sam
differs from itself!This is because the code currently assumes that we only have one entry for each read name at a given coordinate. Moreover, it traverses the "left" and "right" files asymmetrically, so that duplicate entries will get respected in one file but not the other.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: