-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 112
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Incorrectly resolves symlinks #15
Comments
Right now there is no special handling of symbolic links, and counting them at all as the files they point to is something I would want to avoid in future. Right now DUA relies on the file metadata provided by the |
I think this is very dangerous, because recursive deleting may follow the links, possibly deleting the whole home folder. |
Indeed, traversal follows symlinks. Additionally, symlinks are not currently displayed as such and appear like real files. The latter can certainly be fixed during display, as a first step towards making it more clear what's going on. Not following symlinks at all would require a change in the However, when deleting files and directories, |
That is true, but I think it only applies to the non-interactive mode of
I think the fix was not correct, see #27. |
Also see Byron/jwalk#7. |
This issue should be fixed now for the interactive mode, for the aggregate mode this needs to be fixed in jwalk first. |
As symbolic links are not followed, this issue should. There is still a special case which is Thank you |
Symlinks that point to another disk are still counted for current one, resulting in total disk usage bigger than the disk capacity.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: