Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Insight about signed symmetric and unsigned symmetric quantization #13

Open
padeirocarlos opened this issue Apr 23, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Comments

@padeirocarlos
Copy link

I wonder know what is the reason behind the use of the unsigned symmetric quantization for both weight e activation?

For activation it can be understandable since the ReLU is well suited for one-tailed distributions, such as ReLU activations.
But what is the explanations for weights? the distributions that are roughly symmetric about zero.
Have you ever tried to change signed symmetric quantization for weight? What was the results? I tried but the results seem not been good!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant