New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Veterans - Eligibility Verifier + Eligibility Type #1436
Conversation
@thekaveman @angela-tran I'm blocked here: #1437 Do you see any syntax error or something I'm doing wrong? Update: Not blocked anymore. |
bd8b260
to
0fd040d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These changes look good to me @machikoyasuda! I'm inclined to approve, but would like to get others' feedback about the PO entry naming / consolidation. Maybe at the very least we can remove login_gov
from that PO entry msgid and leave the Courtesy Card verifier alone for now.
@thekaveman @angela-tran Ready for re-review, hopefully final review. I added a few changes since the last review from Angela:
I also added these secrets to KeyVault dev: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please update the description to also note that this PR closes #1426
Otherwise this looks good and can be approved once the Test KeyVault secrets are created!
@machikoyasuda To clarify on this PR also closing #1426, have you created the LP group yet? |
@angela-tran No not yet. This is my current status: |
Ready for final...final 😅 ...review, to confirm that this PR can be merged to close 2 issues (#1427 #1426). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me @machikoyasuda 👍
Ah @machikoyasuda I was still reviewing this! |
@@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ | |||
#, fuzzy | |||
msgid "" | |||
msgstr "" | |||
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: https://github.com/cal-itp/benefits/issues \n" | |||
"POT-Creation-Date: 2023-01-26 16:08+0000\n" | |||
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why did we lose our Issues link here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It looks like the helper bin/makemessages.sh
was not run, it is supposed to put this line back.
@thekaveman Oops sorry!!! 😓 I just noticed I get this error after running
which fails when running |
Reported here: #1455 |
closes #1427
closes #1426
What this PR does
EligibilityVerifier
for MST VeteransEligibilityType
for MST Veterans"MST_VETERAN_GROUP_ID"
,"MST_VETERAN_VERIFIER_NAME"
benefit-select.cy.js
spec from looking for 2 radio inputs, to 3 inputs. Update Cypress helper method so it correctly chooses Courtesy Card radio button.EligibilityVerifier
)What configuration has been done
Screenshots
Documentation
EligibilityVerifier model
start_item_secondary_details
, an optionalTextField()
, toEligibilityVerifier
modelMediaItem viewmodel
secondary_details
, an optional string, toMediaItem
viewmodel classThe
secondary_details
is this details paragraph that comes after the bullets, on the Eligibility Start page.Notes
On Production, after going through the Login.gov flow and verifying eligibility, the user sees the
enrollment
screen with this copy, consisting of 2 media items:In the new design, however, there is only 1 media item for all
enrollment
screens, and the remaining media item for Little Pay is also shortened from 2 paragraphs to 1: