Add chemicals industry (old) #348
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Meijun Chen (tud-mchen6)
Co-authored-by: Meijun Chen (github/tud-mchen6)
Co-authored by: Meijun Chen (tud-mchen6)
…en/add-chemical-industry
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Moved comments over from #355.
One of the main things to note here: the energy consumption is being grouped into just a few carriers. This is a strong assumption that I made as to how the chemicals industry will decarbonise (via electrification and synthetic methanol). In future, we would probably want to keep the output of this file in terms of mass of different chemicals and then have an additional step that allows for it to be reformulated to a common hydrocarbon that could be met by carbon-neutral means. As it currently stands, an # ASSUME: ... comment is necessary to explain the process.
| h2_demand = { # t/t | ||
| "Ethylene": 0, | ||
| "Propylene": 0, | ||
| "BTX": 0, | ||
| "Ammonia": 0.178, | ||
| "Methanol": 0.189, | ||
| } | ||
| methanol_demand = { | ||
| "Ethylene": 2.83, | ||
| "Propylene": 2.83, | ||
| "BTX": 4.3, | ||
| "Ammonia": 0, | ||
| "Methanol": 1, | ||
| } | ||
| co2_demand = { # tCO2/t | ||
| "Ethylene": 0, | ||
| "Propylene": 0, | ||
| "BTX": 0, | ||
| "Ammonia": 0.112, # inc. 0.35t_urea/t_ammonia | ||
| "Methanol": 1.373, | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| energy_demand = { # MWh/t | ||
| "Ethylene": 1.4, # MTO process | ||
| "Propylene": 1.4, # MTO process | ||
| "BTX": 1.4, # MTA process | ||
| "Ammonia": 2.05, # inc. 0.35t_urea/t_ammonia | ||
| "Methanol": 1.5, # auxiliary demand, could just be assumed as already included in existing electricity demand | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| mass = { # Bazzanella and Ausfelder, 2017 | ||
| "Ethylene": 21.7, | ||
| "Propylene": 17, | ||
| "BTX": 15.7, | ||
| "Ammonia": 17, | ||
| "Methanol": 2, | ||
| } | ||
| molar_mass = { | ||
| "Ethylene": 28.05, | ||
| "Propylene": 42.08, | ||
| "BTX": 93, | ||
| "Ammonia": 17.01, | ||
| "Methanol": 32.04, | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This should probably all be in the configuration
| H2_LHV_KTOE = 2.863 # 0.0333 TWh/kt LHV -> 2.863ktoe/kt | ||
| MWH_PER_T_TO_KTOE_PER_KT = 0.08598 # 1 MWh/t -> 1 GWh/kt -> 0.08598 ktoe/kt | ||
| METHANOL_LHV_KTOE = 0.476 # 19.915 MJ/kg LHV -> 19915000MJ/kt -> 0.476ktoe/kt |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
(except the MWH_PER_T_TO_KTOE_PER_KT one)
| path_jrc_production: str, | ||
| path_output: Optional[str] = None, | ||
| ): | ||
| # ------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| # Prepare data files | ||
| # ------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Split out these commented steps into separate functions
| return filled_consumption_df | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| def process_chemicals_energy_consumption(electrical_consumption, prod_df, demand): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Missing type hints and docstring explain the input args
|
@irm-codebase ready to rebase onto develop now that #340 is merged in! |
|
Closed since a new version of this feature was created by @tud-mchen6 |
Fixes #311 .
Adding chemicals industry in the industry module.
Checklist
Any checks which are not relevant to the PR can be pre-checked by the PR creator. All others should be checked by the reviewer. You can add extra checklist items here if required by the PR.