Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

shopfloor: fix singleton error #104

Conversation

sebalix
Copy link
Member

@sebalix sebalix commented Nov 2, 2020

It currently happens on location content transfer scenario.

Ref. 1615

@sebalix sebalix force-pushed the 13.0-shopfloor-fix-singleton-error branch from 9a5fb25 to 2f275a1 Compare November 2, 2020 09:31
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Nov 2, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #104 into 13.0-shopfloor will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##           13.0-shopfloor     #104   +/-   ##
===============================================
  Coverage           90.38%   90.38%           
===============================================
  Files                  95       95           
  Lines                5364     5366    +2     
===============================================
+ Hits                 4848     4850    +2     
  Misses                516      516           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
shopfloor/models/stock_move_line.py 97.80% <100.00%> (+0.04%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 456dc3c...2f275a1. Read the comment docs.

@simahawk simahawk merged commit 25c1483 into camptocamp:13.0-shopfloor Nov 2, 2020
@sebalix sebalix deleted the 13.0-shopfloor-fix-singleton-error branch November 2, 2020 09:58
simahawk pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2021
Signed-off-by simahawk
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants