Add more info about reusable parts. #527
Conversation
|
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
1 similar comment
|
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
| [the wiki](https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Snappy/Parts) and the content from there will be | ||
| used to build the part locally. As the number of published parts increases writing | ||
| a snapcraft.yaml file will get easier as one would simply include a set of published | ||
| parts and their app specific part(s). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
we should probably document how parts are to be defined here. Maybe not just right now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I find that last "and their app specific part(s)" confusing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Updated. Please let me know if it's still unclear or confusing.
| [the wiki](https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Snappy/Parts) and reused by other snapcraft.yaml | ||
| files. A part that does not include the 'plugin' option will be searched for on | ||
| [the wiki](https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Snappy/Parts) and the content from there will be | ||
| used to build the part locally. As the number of published parts increases writing |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think you are missing a comma:
As the number of published parts increases, writing
|
In markdown you can define the link once (generally at the bottom) with something like [wiki]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Snappy/Parts, and make use of it on the rest of the document with [the wiki][wiki]. Then you won't have to duplicate the url everywhere. |
josepht
force-pushed
the
bug_1582499
branch
2 times, most recently
from
31543dd
to
132d51f
Compare
|
👍 |
|
I am thinking of leaving this open until we have the new formatting in place which the parser would grab. |
|
The travis errors look to me like infrastructure failures not test failures. |
|
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
5 similar comments
|
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
|
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
|
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
|
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
|
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
|
👍 |
| because one would simply include a set of published parts and the local part(s) | ||
| specific to the snap being created. | ||
|
|
||
| [wiki]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Snappy/Parts |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
mind updating this? Also mention the format a bit
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Updated. I added an explanation of the wiki entry format and an example. I also added a note saying it can take up to an hour for the wiki update to become available to snapcraft.
Add link to the parts wiki in serveral places and add a section to the parts documentation explaining how to reuse parts. LP: #1582499
* Create a reusable link for the wiki.
|
thanks Joe! 👍 |
Add link to the parts wiki in serveral places and add a section to the parts documentation explaining how to reuse parts. LP: #1582499
Add link to the parts wiki in serveral places and add a section to
the parts documentation explaining how to reuse parts.
LP: #1582499