Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lesson authorship for peer review #93

Closed
ewallace opened this issue Dec 20, 2022 · 9 comments · Fixed by #98
Closed

Lesson authorship for peer review #93

ewallace opened this issue Dec 20, 2022 · 9 comments · Fixed by #98

Comments

@ewallace
Copy link
Collaborator

Hello!

We are gearing up for submission of this Good Enough Practices lesson to Carpentries Lab for peer review and publication. So it's time to check that we have the authorship represented fairly.
Current authors listed are

Other contributors include:

Please, if you would like to be listed as an author, edit the AUTHORS file and make a pull request.
If you would not, please comment on this thread.

Thanks,
Edward

@zkamvar
Copy link
Contributor

zkamvar commented Dec 20, 2022

Thank you for checking for authorship and for providing a way out! My only contribution to this repository was #85, which was maintenance for infrastructure unrelated to the lesson content. I do not believe I should be listed in the AUTHORS file.

@JenDaub
Copy link
Contributor

JenDaub commented Dec 20, 2022

Hi Edward, Thanks for checking, I do not believe I should be listed in the AUTHORS file either.

@egountouna
Copy link

Hi, thank you for checking, it's been a while and I'm not sure what the criteria are exactly. As far as I recall, I participated in a workshop/hackathon to shape the content and contributed an exercise to the data management section.

@tobyhodges
Copy link
Member

Thanks @ewallace I would not like to be listed as an author. My contributions have all been very minor, and mostly cosmetic. Furthermore, I would not like to introduce any potential conflict of interest as I act as Editor to the lesson review process in The Carpentries Lab.

@ewallace
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ewallace commented Jan 9, 2023

Thanks everyone.

  • @emma-wilson is making some further contributions and authorship will be clear.

I am still waiting to hear from:

Please do let me know in this thread.

@ewallace
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ewallace commented Jan 9, 2023

Hi, thank you for checking, it's been a while and I'm not sure what the criteria are exactly. As far as I recall, I participated in a workshop/hackathon to shape the content and contributed an exercise to the data management section.

That sounds like authorship to me.

@MatthiasMimault
Copy link
Contributor

Hi same as egoutouna for me !
Happy to be classed as author for the hackathon contribution for the Track change and Collaboration sections, plus timing correction.
Cheers

@tzielins
Copy link
Contributor

For authorship I populated the main content and I was at hackatone.

@FlicAnderson
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, apologies for late response. I attended a hackthon and added an exercise, so I've created a PR adding my name to AUTHORS file: #97

ewallace added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 24, 2023
…-authorship

Add authorship (re: #93): added exercise to 03-software.md, at hackathon
ewallace added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 24, 2023
@ewallace ewallace linked a pull request Jan 24, 2023 that will close this issue
ameynert pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 24, 2023
zkamvar pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 31, 2023
zkamvar pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 31, 2023
…-authorship

Add authorship (re: #93): added exercise to 03-software.md, at hackathon
zkamvar pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 31, 2023
zkamvar pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

8 participants