Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(balance): double stone pouch capacity. #4461

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 10, 2024

Conversation

Lamandus
Copy link
Contributor

Purpose of change

The stone pouch was inferior in nearly any way to drop leg pouches. The maximum they could hold was 750 ml (per leg) so 1500 ml for 2 pouches, with a encumbrance of 4. Drop leg pouches have a capacity of 4000 ml and also an encumbrance of 4.

Describe the solution

Doubling the amount makes 2 stone pouches hold 2.500 ml of stones, while still lower than the drop leg, it takes less time to reload, and is easier to craft. Having more than 40 stones (for 2 pouches) is rarely needed.

Describe alternatives you've considered

Lowering encumbrance to 3 or even 2.

Testing

Additional context

Checklist

@github-actions github-actions bot added the data PRs related to datas. Won't crash game (probably) label Apr 10, 2024
@Zireael07
Copy link
Contributor

Drop leg pouches are a modern, specialized item, obviously a survival/pre-modern item will be inferior

@Lamandus
Copy link
Contributor Author

Drop leg pouches are a modern, specialized item, obviously a survival/pre-modern item will be inferior

correct. It still is, but don't forget, it can't carry anything else than stone "ammo", so it is extremely specialized.

@scarf005 scarf005 self-assigned this Apr 10, 2024
@scarf005 scarf005 merged commit eee2d5b into cataclysmbnteam:main Apr 10, 2024
10 checks passed
@Lamandus Lamandus deleted the stonepouch branch April 10, 2024 15:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
data PRs related to datas. Won't crash game (probably)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants