standardize the calc checks for the total to subtotal calcs

[cmgosnell]

PR Overview

I don't love this overall... but it is a first attempt to standardize the way we are checking the total to subtotal calcs. I:

• added a is_total_to_subdimensions_calc bool column back into the calc components table
• in both the transform step (in reconcile_table_calculations) and in the explode step (in reconcile_intertable_calculations) we now use calculate_values_from_components and check_calculation_metrics twice: once for the "normal" calcs and once for the total-to-subdimension calcs.

Notes:

• this did not fix the high error rate on the balance sheet asset explosion.
• I still think it feels nicer overall bc is removes almost duplicate code for the old version of this check.
• I think it could be a cleaner if we thought through a way to just have these two calc-ing/metrics-ing functions deal with the logic of what is a total-to-sub-dim calc instead of calling them twice. I tried adding the is_total_to_subdimensions_calc into the pks of the groupby and ran into a slight snag.. i still think its possible but i wanted to get a proof out before leaving.
• Because this didn't solve the asset explosions' problem... my suspicion is this is because this electric_plant_depreciation_change_ferc1 has... ALLL OF THE DIMENSIONS. and perhaps we are introducing some double counting into the calc components because of it? not sure at all just a hunch.

PR Checklist

• Merge the most recent version of the branch you are merging into (probably dev).
• All CI checks are passing. Run tests locally to debug failures
• Make sure you've included good docstrings.
• For major data coverage & analysis changes, run data validation tests
• Include unit tests for new functions and classes.
• Defensive data quality/sanity checks in analyses & data processing functions.
• Update the release notes and reference reference the PR and related issues.
• Do your own explanatory review of the PR to help the reviewer understand what's going on and identify issues preemptively.

[cmgosnell]

there are no total to sub-dimension inter-table calcs rn but this felt like a good thing to run nonetheless

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (67822df) 88.6% compared to head (60b13c2) 88.6%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             dev   #2886     +/-   ##
=======================================
- Coverage   88.6%   88.6%   -0.1%     
=======================================
  Files         90      90             
  Lines      10809   10808      -1     
=======================================
- Hits        9577    9576      -1     
  Misses      1232    1232             

Files	Coverage Δ
src/pudl/output/ferc1.py	88.8% <100.0%> (+<0.1%)	⬆️
src/pudl/transform/ferc1.py	96.6% <100.0%> (-0.1%)	⬇️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[zaneselvans]

Definitely an improvement!