Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expanding support of non-unitary functions for the deterministic quantum circuit simulator #89

Closed
33Gjl1Xe opened this issue Jun 22, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #321
Milestone

Comments

@33Gjl1Xe
Copy link
Contributor

Adding measurement, classical controlled operations, and reset operations to the density matrix simulator.

@33Gjl1Xe 33Gjl1Xe changed the title Expanding support of non-unitary functions Expanding support of non-unitary functions for the deterministic quantum circuit simulator Jun 22, 2022
@33Gjl1Xe
Copy link
Contributor Author

@burgholzer burgholzer added this to the DDSIM 2.0 milestone Feb 16, 2024
burgholzer added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 23, 2024
## Description

This PR adds support for non-unitary operations such as mid-circuit
measurements and resets to the noise-aware simulation approaches in
DDSIM.
Furthermore, it exposes both noise-aware simulators as Qiskit backends.
For the first time, this makes them available to the Python users of
DDSIM.

Fixes #89
Fixes #93

## Checklist:

<!---
This checklist serves as a reminder of a couple of things that ensure
your pull request will be merged swiftly.
-->

- [x] The pull request only contains commits that are related to it.
- [x] I have added appropriate tests and documentation.
- [x] I have made sure that all CI jobs on GitHub pass.
- [x] The pull request introduces no new warnings and follows the
project's style guidelines.

---------

Signed-off-by: burgholzer <burgholzer@me.com>
Co-authored-by: Thomas Grurl <thomas.grurl@fh-hagenberg.at>
Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: burgholzer <burgholzer@me.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants