Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update source code change terminology #85

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

erkist
Copy link
Collaborator

@erkist erkist commented Jul 19, 2021

PR to rename source code change to source code change proposal, as per discussion #34

Note: The Change Merged event is not referred to as a proposal. My reasoning is that it stops being a proposal and becomes an actual change when it is being merged. But I don't have a strong opinion on it, it might be better to refer to it as a change proposal here as well, for consistency.

@salaboy
Copy link
Contributor

salaboy commented Jul 19, 2021

@erkist +1 for this change

- **Change Proposal Reviewed Event**: someone (user) or an automated system submitted a review to the source code change proposal. A user or an automated system needs to be in charge of understanding how many approvals/rejections are needed for this change proposal to be merged or rejected. The review event needs to include if the change proposal is approved by the reviewer, more changes are needed or if the change proposal is rejected.
- **Change Proposal Abandoned Event**: a tool or a user decides that the change proposal should be abandoned, for instance because it has been inactive for a while.
- **Change Proposal Updated**: the change proposal has been updated, for example a new commit is added or removed from an existing change proposal.
- **Change Merged Event**: the change proposal is made a change by it being merged to the target branch where it was submitted.
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rename to Change Proposal Merged for consistency

@afrittoli
Copy link
Member

@erkist Thank you for this! Since we now have https://github.org/cdevents/spec, would you mind re-submitting your PR there? Thank you!

@afrittoli
Copy link
Member

@erkist shall we merge this anyways or close it?

@m-linner-ericsson
Copy link
Collaborator

@erkist @afrittoli This is still not in the CDEvents spec right?

@e-backmark-ericsson
Copy link
Collaborator

Closing this PR here, as the spec has moved to cdevents org. An issue is created there to cater for this proposal instead. If still relevant, a new PR needs to be created there instead.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants