Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] refactor: use C libcbor instead of msgpack cbor #88

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

grzuy
Copy link
Contributor

@grzuy grzuy commented Oct 9, 2018

Closes #63

Blocked by PJK/libcbor-ruby#6

  • Fix tests
  • Update docs with new system lib prerequisite

Related cedarcode/cose-ruby#43

@grzuy
Copy link
Contributor Author

grzuy commented Jan 22, 2019

FWIW, some (if not all) issues we're seeing in this PR are related to PJK/libcbor-ruby#5.

@bdewater
Copy link
Collaborator

One concern I have here is that having to install libcbor separately is not great. It breaks the "just run bundle install and you're done" workflow we have now.

It would be nice if we can package the library with the gem or provide pre-installed binaries like https://github.com/cowboyd/libv8

@grzuy
Copy link
Contributor Author

grzuy commented Jul 2, 2019

Yes, I agree it is not ideal to add a sys level dependency.

It would be interesting to explore that possibility of packaging or providing binaries. If we do that, I'd consider first proposing that change to the libcbor gem. That's really were the dependency is coming from.

@grzuy
Copy link
Contributor Author

grzuy commented Nov 27, 2019

Closing for now.
Same reason as in cedarcode/cose-ruby#43 (comment).

@grzuy grzuy closed this Nov 27, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

CBOR library choice
2 participants