Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update mocha to version 2.5.2 🚀 #22

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello 👋

🚀🚀🚀

mocha just published its new version 2.5.2, which is not covered by your current version range.

If this pull request passes your tests you can publish your software with the latest version of mocha – otherwise use this branch to work on adaptions and fixes.

Happy fixing and merging 🌴


The new version differs by 57 commits .

  • fdbbe40 Release v2.5.2
  • c094f20 Rebuild mocha.js
  • 7c134ea Update CHANGELOG.md for v2.5.2 [ci skip]
  • 25f9378 Add .envrc to .gitignore
  • 49b5ff1 Avoid double and triple xUnit XML escaping (#2178)
  • 015b809 Release v2.5.1
  • 3ef083e update CHANGELOG.md [ci skip]
  • bd9450b to-iso-string must be a dependency
  • 30e917b Release v2.5.0
  • 443697f rebuild mocha.js
  • 9bfbc9e update CHANGELOG.md, contributors, .mailmap
  • 524862b full browserification support; closes #880 (#2271)
  • 9e8cbaa try different strategy for avoiding insecure sauce connect
  • f8a3d86 trying to fix travis + sauce check for PRs and forks
  • 0dde0fa don't run SauceLabs tests on PRs

There are 57 commits in total. See the full diff.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented May 24, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 033d397 on greenkeeper-mocha-2.5.2 into 4838000 on master.

@ceejbot ceejbot closed this Dec 21, 2016
@ceejbot ceejbot deleted the greenkeeper-mocha-2.5.2 branch December 21, 2016 21:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants