Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated tick labels in AllSkyMapCartopy #16

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 19, 2022

Conversation

kwat0308
Copy link
Contributor

Updated the tick labels in AllSkyMapCartopy. Now longitude labels work for any longitude, and latitude labels work for all longitudes (except at lon_0 = 0). Additional option for not drawing the ylabels is also included.

@cescalara cescalara self-requested a review August 19, 2022 09:06
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 19, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #16 (7c5da6e) into ta_updates (d9ec190) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           ta_updates     #16   +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage        0.00%   0.00%           
==========================================
  Files              29      29           
  Lines            2542    2498   -44     
==========================================
+ Misses           2542    2498   -44     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
fancy/plotting/allskymap_cartopy.py 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

Copy link
Owner

@cescalara cescalara left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this!

@cescalara cescalara merged commit 8389940 into cescalara:ta_updates Aug 19, 2022
@kwat0308 kwat0308 deleted the ta_updates_cartopy branch September 16, 2022 12:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants