Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 14, 2021. It is now read-only.

Use Mixlib::Archive rather than Minitar #1558

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 7, 2018

Conversation

thommay
Copy link
Contributor

@thommay thommay commented Apr 27, 2018

We're now consistently using the same archive tech through our entire
system, and we're not dependent on rubygems but are using a standard and
stable (libarchive) implementation

This is dependent on chef/mixlib-archive#18

@thommay thommay requested a review from a team April 27, 2018 14:51
Copy link
Contributor

@danielsdeleo danielsdeleo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🎉 excited to see this and fix that path length bug!

@thommay thommay force-pushed the tm/mixlib_archive_policies branch 4 times, most recently from ca66eb6 to a22a7cb Compare May 4, 2018 13:15
We're now consistently using the same archive tech through our entire
system, and we're not dependent on rubygems but are using a standard and
stable (libarchive) implementation

Signed-off-by: Thom May <thom@chef.io>
@thommay thommay force-pushed the tm/mixlib_archive_policies branch from a22a7cb to 7f083b7 Compare May 4, 2018 13:18
@lamont-granquist lamont-granquist merged commit 7c25b6a into master May 7, 2018
@tas50 tas50 deleted the tm/mixlib_archive_policies branch May 7, 2018 18:56
@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Jul 6, 2018

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 6, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants