cpu: add support for arm64 cpuinfo fields #1010
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Looks good to me, but you have a chefstyle warning. |
Signed-off-by: Davide Cavalca <dcavalca@fb.com>
thommay
approved these changes
Jun 7, 2017
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Signed-off-by: Davide Cavalca dcavalca@fb.com
Description
On arm64 the format of
/proc/cpuinfois different. This change adds basic support to exposefeaturesandbogomips, which are the most useful fields. Note that these fields are per-processor, while on S390 they're only set once, so we can't really reuse that logic.Issues Resolved
None that I could find, though I can file one if needed
Check List