Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EQ 560 gain/Q interaction problem? #4

Closed
jonlinnarson opened this issue Jun 7, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

EQ 560 gain/Q interaction problem? #4

jonlinnarson opened this issue Jun 7, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@jonlinnarson
Copy link

I love your EQ 560 (it's probably the greatest graphic EQ there is in JS format) but I noticed that there might be a miscalculation in the max Q value.

In line 79 the maximum Q value of 5.763566 seems too large. If you divide it by 8, so that it becomes 0.72044575, the gain/Q interaction becomes pretty much identical to UAD's API 560. I don't own a real one (unfortunately) so I can't say for sure that this is how a real 560 behaves, but UAD are usually pretty close with the filter shapes in their EQs.

I did upload my own modded version to the Reaper stash, but I should ofc have asked you first. If you'd like I can remove it again!

Thanks for your great work!

(PS: Now that Reaper has native plug-in instance and FX-chain oversampling it could make sense to have a on/off control for the internal oversampling, just in case someone wants to use the FX-chain oversampling function)

@chkhld
Copy link
Owner

chkhld commented Nov 12, 2023

Don't worry, you don't need to remove your file from the Reaper stash. 😆

This EQ is not supposed to be a direct copy of the 560, but granted, I did A/B it with a few hardware and software clones. I set the values to what I think sounded good, not to what an actual 560 sounds like.

Already at the time of uploading, I considered if it's worth renaming it to something else so it won't suffer from this "but it doesn't sound exactly like" problem. But I couldn't think of a better name, so project name 560 it was. 🤷

At some point in the future, I'll re-visit several of these plugins and update them, I'll consider the oversampling switch if I can remember. ;)

@chkhld chkhld closed this as completed Nov 12, 2023
@chkhld chkhld self-assigned this Nov 12, 2023
@chkhld chkhld added the question Further information is requested label Nov 12, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants