Skip to content

chkt/continuity

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

23 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Tests Version Node Dependencies Licence Language Size

Continuity

Sequentially aligned promise resolution

Install

npm install @chkt/continuity

Use

In this example we create three promises, each immediately resolving to the values 1, 2 and 3. Then the processing of each promise becomes blocked for a random amount of time by calling randomTimeout(). Afterwards The execution of subsequent .then() calls is being realigned to correspond the the order in which their calls to sequencer.align() were made.

import * as assert from 'assert';
import { createSequencer } from '@chkt/continuity';

function randomTimeout(val:number) : Promise<number> {
  return new Promise(resolve => {
    setTimeout(
      resolve.bind(null, val), 
      Math.floor(Math.random() * 1000)
    );
  });
}

const sequencer = createSequencer();
const result:number[] = [];

const promises = [ 
  Promise.resolve(1), 
  Promise.resolve(2), 
  Promise.resolve(3) 
];

const resolved = promises.map(promise => promise
  .then(randomTimeout)
  .then(sequencer.align())
  .then(val => result.push(val))
);

Promise.all(resolved).then(() => {
  assert.deepStrictEqual(result, [ 1, 2, 3 ]);
});

Note that while the order in which promises are resolved is guaranteed, by the nature of common promise implementations, the order in which subsequent .then() handlers are executed is not.

import * as assert from 'assert';
import { createSequencer } from '@chkt/continuity';

const sequencer = createSequencer();
const ids:string[] = [];

const idA = sequencer.register();

const promiseB = sequencer
  .immediate()
  .then(function pushB() {
    ids.push('b');
  });

const promiseA = Promise
  .resolve()
  .then(() => sequencer.resolve(idA))
  .then(function pushA() {
    ids.push('a');
  });

Promise
  .all([ promiseA, promiseB ])
  .then(() => {
    assert.deepStrictEqual(ids, [ 'a', 'b' ]);
  });

For most modern javascript engines (including V8 and Spidermonkey) the example above will resolve to false. Although the Promises are resolved in the order promiseA, promiseB, both engines schedule the execution of pushA after the execution of pushB.

Using .schedule() instead will guarantee handler execution order.

Api

interface SequencerConfig {
  readonly firstId? : number;
  readonly maxRatio? : number;
  readonly maxDelay? : number;
}

enum result_type { immediate, late, queued }

interface ScheduleResult {
  readonly id : number;
  readonly type : result_type;
}

interface Sequencer {
  register() : number; // get a sequential id
  schedule(id:number, fn:(result:ScheduleResult) => void) : void; // schedule a registered id for processing
  resolve(id:number) : Promise<ScheduleResult>; // get a promise representing a scheduled id
  immediate() : Promise<ScheduleResult>; // shorthand for sequencer.resolve(sequencer.register())
  align<T>() : (val:T) => Promise<T>; // get a trigger function for scheduling
  assign<T>(p:Promise<T>) : Promise<T>; // shorthand for promise.then(sequencer.align())
}

type createSequencer = (config:SequencerConfig) => Sequencer;

About

Sequentially aligned promise resolution

Topics

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published