Best practice for mapping visit_detail_concept_id value #94
-
I am wondering if the cited 'Visit' domain as specified in OMOP CDM v5.4 visit_detail section is the best set for mapping visit_detail_concept_id. For our visits, we found more suitable visit descriptors in that fell in the Observation domain. I attached our mapping file for an example. The source concepts are the ones we mapped to internally, and the target fields are our attempts to map to visit domain concepts. Any guidance is greatly appreciated. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 3 comments
-
Hope this helps folks. At MGB we do have visit types that fall outside of what is matched up with the standard concepts in Concept Vocab table with
For the data set we have these handle the majority of the visit types, we have about 5 visit types currently unaccounted for so they will fail DQD at the moment.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks, @heschmidt04, for following up on this question! @mkrile38 - thanks for the question! The |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
This is more of a side bar, but ties into visit_detail. I was seeing a pattern in our ADT data that showed a Discharge event after a "Hospital Outpatient" event that was for a procedure (MRI, XR, CUPID, CT Head, Lab long term monitoring, COX2, etc.) and noticed that our logic didn't catch that combination. Also, for MGB data I made the decision to use code 32216 for anything that indicated leaving or not showing up; including "Elope to another provider" (which tickled my funny bone) Hope that ends up helping folks who get to this point of tracking down visit types (admit and discharge) that DQD (Data Quality Dashboard) determines have empty values. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Thanks, @heschmidt04, for following up on this question!
@mkrile38 - thanks for the question! The
visit_detail_concept_id
field is reserved for concepts in the VISIT domain only, and we advise you to not use concepts from other domains in this field. Many different OMOP-related tools rely on proper domain association of concepts to work properly, and VISIT_DETAIL is no exception. If you have source descriptions without any reasonable match in the VISIT domain, it's possible that we can create CHoRUS specific concepts for VISIT_DETAIL events that match your descriptions. Let's plan to discuss further offline