Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proof T4RUPT_PROGRAM #642

Open
wopian opened this issue Feb 20, 2020 · 6 comments · May be fixed by #836
Open

Proof T4RUPT_PROGRAM #642

wopian opened this issue Feb 20, 2020 · 6 comments · May be fixed by #836
Assignees
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@wopian
Copy link
Collaborator

wopian commented Feb 20, 2020

Proof read transcribed code of T4RUPT_PROGRAM against scans

ℹ️ Multiple PRs for ~15 pages at a time are recommended!

⚠️ This file is densely commented in places!

Lines: 1354
Page: 0155—0189 (34)

Reduced quality scans can be found here

@wopian wopian added Help Wanted Size: Huge 1500 to 2999 lines labels Feb 20, 2020
@wopian wopian added this to the Luminary099 milestone Feb 20, 2020
@wopian wopian added Size: Large 750 to 1499 lines and removed Size: Huge 1500 to 2999 lines labels Feb 20, 2020
@zpeters
Copy link
Contributor

zpeters commented Oct 6, 2020

I will grab this one.

@wopian wopian assigned zpeters and unassigned zpeters Oct 7, 2020
@wopian
Copy link
Collaborator Author

wopian commented Oct 7, 2020

@zpeters it would be preferable to do the Tiny, Small and Moderate issues before tackling these larger issues

@zpeters
Copy link
Contributor

zpeters commented Oct 7, 2020 via email

@ishaterdal
Copy link

I can work on this!

@dimitraz
Copy link

dimitraz commented Oct 2, 2021

Is this one still available for Hacktoberfest?

@wopian wopian assigned dimitraz and unassigned ishaterdal Oct 4, 2021
@wopian
Copy link
Collaborator Author

wopian commented Oct 4, 2021

Is this one still available for Hacktoberfest?

Yes :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants