Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Current syntax is magic #241

Open
gpampara opened this issue Feb 14, 2016 · 1 comment
Open

Current syntax is magic #241

gpampara opened this issue Feb 14, 2016 · 1 comment
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@gpampara
Copy link
Member

The current syntax for Step, StepS and algorithm usage seems a bit magical - can we simplify it?

@gpampara gpampara added enhancement New feature or request Investigate labels Feb 14, 2016
@gpampara
Copy link
Member Author

The algorithm related syntax is largely focused on the Heterogeneous stuff. I think that with some more concrete types instead of just using function types, this syntax can be completely removed.

The use of some real types will also make the scala type checker a bit more happy.... not that it's particularly strong in this regard

@gpampara gpampara added question Further information is requested and removed enhancement New feature or request labels May 14, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant