Skip to content

Issues: cjph8914/2020_benfords

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

35 Open 2 Closed
35 Open 2 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Strongest Evidence there was election fraud.
#42 opened Nov 16, 2020 by chavenor
1,2,3 digit Benford plots for Texas (2020 to 1992 presidential elections) using county aggregated counts
#41 opened Nov 15, 2020 by bd271828
3
Starting and working on new repository
#40 opened Nov 11, 2020 by bd271828
Add a Way to Simulate an Election With Given Parameters
#39 opened Nov 11, 2020 by snex
2
Election Fraud Data Check of Dr. Shiva
#38 opened Nov 10, 2020 by chavenor
25
Data from multiple providers?
#37 opened Nov 10, 2020 by tomdotcash
2
The average ward in Milwaukee has 750 votes, how would Biden have 100-200 in 30% of wards?
#36 opened Nov 10, 2020 by dlb8685
14
2BL test more appropiate for appropriate for election fraud
#35 opened Nov 10, 2020 by Enclavet
2
You might want to quantify the deviation of data from the Benford's law for each graph
#33 opened Nov 9, 2020 by yurivict
Breakdown by vote type
#32 opened Nov 9, 2020 by snex
8
Why is the Biden Election Day vote data nearly Gaussian ?
#31 opened Nov 9, 2020 by charlesmartin14
29
Benfords law regarding election data needs to use the second digit analysis
#30 opened Nov 9, 2020 by tehmikey
1
Allegheny, PA absentee votes, second digit
#27 opened Nov 9, 2020 by ghost
24
For comparison...
#26 opened Nov 9, 2020 by MatthiasWinkelmann
Chicago data source
#22 opened Nov 8, 2020 by yychenca
2
Reach out to the voter integrity project
#21 opened Nov 8, 2020 by CoderKing2020
1
Understanding the plot
#20 opened Nov 8, 2020 by krist-jin
9
Some more ideas based on infamous examples from other countries
#19 opened Nov 7, 2020 by blajer
8
Florida is benford law
#18 opened Nov 7, 2020 by korentzari
3
Milwaukee ward sizes are small and there is a highly preferred candidate
#17 opened Nov 7, 2020 by frycast
83
Paper suggests that even second-digit analysis cannot be used
#16 opened Nov 7, 2020 by ghost
1
Does anybody have a dataset known to be fraudulent?
#15 opened Nov 7, 2020 by dshield55
5
Data availability
#14 opened Nov 7, 2020 by aham41
2
For numbers summed to 100%, there can be no such thing that only one member doesn't follow Benford's rule.
#13 opened Nov 7, 2020 by szabolcsvelkei
17
According to my research second-digit tests are more reliable for detecting election fraud
#12 opened Nov 7, 2020 by draeder
12
ProTip! Add no:assignee to see everything that’s not assigned.