-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use try!() instead of ? operator, for older compilers #752
Conversation
appveyor failed because of a (?) compiler bug? |
It seems to be removed in 7cb44ab as well, but the |
Ah yep that one was just missed when I was fixing merge conflicts from the earlier revert! Thanks for catching it! @homu r+ |
📌 Commit 62e6a1e has been approved by |
Use try!() instead of ? operator, for older compilers This is a proposal. Some distros (yes, I'm using the distro rustc because my distro has some benefits over using the rustup infrastructure) do not yet have the newest compiler. I therefor propose to stay with `try!()` instead of `?` for maybe two weeks or so, maybe even a bit more, until all distros have updated their version of `rustc`.
Use try!() instead of ? operator, for older compilers This is a proposal. Some distros (yes, I'm using the distro rustc because my distro has some benefits over using the rustup infrastructure) do not yet have the newest compiler. I therefor propose to stay with `try!()` instead of `?` for maybe two weeks or so, maybe even a bit more, until all distros have updated their version of `rustc`.
💡 This pull request was already approved, no need to approve it again.
|
📌 Commit 62e6a1e has been approved by |
☀️ Test successful - status |
👀 Test was successful, but fast-forwarding failed: 422 Required status check "coverage/coveralls" is pending. |
This is a proposal.
Some distros (yes, I'm using the distro rustc because my distro has some benefits over using the rustup infrastructure) do not yet have the newest compiler.
I therefor propose to stay with
try!()
instead of?
for maybe two weeks or so, maybe even a bit more, until all distros have updated their version ofrustc
.