Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

g77/ifort builds appear to be failing #56

Closed
ahmadia opened this issue Aug 22, 2011 · 6 comments
Closed

g77/ifort builds appear to be failing #56

ahmadia opened this issue Aug 22, 2011 · 6 comments

Comments

@ahmadia
Copy link
Member

ahmadia commented Aug 22, 2011

We need to expand our testing to cover some other common setups such as Ubuntu without gfortran and decide whether we can support them or not.

@ahmadia
Copy link
Member Author

ahmadia commented Aug 22, 2011

this issue was pointed out by @klonuo

@ketch
Copy link
Member

ketch commented Aug 22, 2011

Thanks for bringing this up, but...

SharpClaw is all F90 code (modules, etc.) The next version of Clawpack will also use modules. Hence we can't support F77 compilers (unless we plan to maintain a separate set of Clawpack Fortran code just for that, which seems unreasonable to me).

Of course, you can run the pure Python (1D) code without any Fortran.

@ketch ketch closed this as completed Aug 22, 2011
@mandli
Copy link
Member

mandli commented Sep 3, 2011

g77 should not work but ifort should in theory, does has ifort been tested yet?

@mandli mandli reopened this Nov 30, 2011
@mandli mandli closed this as completed Nov 30, 2011
@mandli
Copy link
Member

mandli commented Nov 30, 2011

I just started testing with ifort 11.1 on my ubuntu machine and I can confirm that PyClaw does not work in this case. This could be moved to a different ticket which I will now do.

@mandli
Copy link
Member

mandli commented Nov 30, 2011

Fixed, this was a result of another f2py problem that I am working, look up an issue regarding f2py, FFLAGS and -fPIC.

@mandli
Copy link
Member

mandli commented Nov 30, 2011

Issue is #102

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants