You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am using huggingface to fine-tune bert large on the CLINC dataset. I follow the hyperparameters mentioned in hyperparams.csv but there's ~3 point difference in inscope accuracy for the oos-train setting (93.49 v/s 96.9 for Full version of the dataset; similarly for the OOS-Plus setting). I am wondering if this is due to some HF defaults, for e.g., HF defaults to 1.0 for gradient clipping, I am not sure what did you use. Would it be possible to clarify a bit more about your fine-tuning process? It'd be very helpful.
Thanks,
Gaurav.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
I am using huggingface to fine-tune bert large on the CLINC dataset. I follow the hyperparameters mentioned in
hyperparams.csv
but there's ~3 point difference in inscope accuracy for theoos-train
setting (93.49 v/s 96.9 for Full version of the dataset; similarly for the OOS-Plus setting). I am wondering if this is due to some HF defaults, for e.g., HF defaults to 1.0 for gradient clipping, I am not sure what did you use. Would it be possible to clarify a bit more about your fine-tuning process? It'd be very helpful.Thanks,
Gaurav.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: