Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create service instance using V3 possible? #1131

Open
swaroop65 opened this issue Jan 31, 2022 · 6 comments
Open

Create service instance using V3 possible? #1131

swaroop65 opened this issue Jan 31, 2022 · 6 comments
Labels
enhancement Improvement or new functionality triaged Initial triage of issue has been performed

Comments

@swaroop65
Copy link

We are trying to create a service instance using v3 api from cf-java-client. We couldn't find an implementation for v3 in the latest version 5.6.0.RELEASE of Cloud-foundry-operations. We also noticed that the cloud-foundry-client / cloud-foundry-client-reactor doesn't have all the necessary request and response models to support v3 service instance creation.

Question:
Is there a way to create a service instance using v3 from cf-java-client?

@dmikusa
Copy link
Contributor

dmikusa commented Feb 2, 2022

We couldn't find an implementation for v3 in the latest version 5.6.0.RELEASE of Cloud-foundry-operations. We also noticed that the cloud-foundry-client / cloud-foundry-client-reactor doesn't have all the necessary request and response models to support v3 service instance creation.

What specifically were you expecting to find but didn't? If you could link to the API doc for the request you want to make, I can confirm if we do or do not have that. We do not have 100% coverage of the v3 API so it is possible that we're missing a request you need. We do have quite a few of the common API requests covered though, including at least some coverage for service plans, offerings, instances, and bindings.

If you could just send me links using http://v3-apidocs.cloudfoundry.org/version/3.113.0/index.html for the requests you need, that'll help narrow this down. Thanks

@dmikusa dmikusa added question triaged Initial triage of issue has been performed labels Feb 2, 2022
@omid-soleimani
Copy link

omid-soleimani commented Feb 2, 2022

We couldn't find an implementation for v3 in the latest version 5.6.0.RELEASE of Cloud-foundry-operations. We also noticed that the cloud-foundry-client / cloud-foundry-client-reactor doesn't have all the necessary request and response models to support v3 service instance creation.

What specifically were you expecting to find but didn't? If you could link to the API doc for the request you want to make, I can confirm if we do or do not have that. We do not have 100% coverage of the v3 API so it is possible that we're missing a request you need. We do have quite a few of the common API requests covered though, including at least some coverage for service plans, offerings, instances, and bindings.

If you could just send me links using http://v3-apidocs.cloudfoundry.org/version/3.113.0/index.html for the requests you need, that'll help narrow this down. Thanks

Thank you so much Daniel
http://v3-apidocs.cloudfoundry.org/version/3.113.0/index.html#create-a-service-instance
and
http://v3-apidocs.cloudfoundry.org/version/3.113.0/index.html#get-a-service-instance

@dmikusa dmikusa added enhancement Improvement or new functionality and removed question labels Feb 4, 2022
@dmikusa
Copy link
Contributor

dmikusa commented Feb 4, 2022

Thanks. Acknowledged. Those are indeed missing.

I'll flag this as a feature request & we'll add it to the backlog. If you are interested in submitting a PR to add them, I can certainly help with questions, review, and merging.

@Suyash08Oct
Copy link

Hey, Is there any update with the v3 related APIs. I can see these APIs are still not available for some of the generic use cases of service instance and service keys. Is something related to it is queued for release. Please provide the info.

@Suyash08Oct
Copy link

can check some PRs available related to v3 update like #1157.

@dmikusa
Copy link
Contributor

dmikusa commented Jul 12, 2022

@Suyash08Oct Thanks for reaching out #1157 is on the list to be reviewed soon. The plan is to get #1157, #1158 and #1159 reviewed and merged, then cut a release. I can't give you a time frame, having not yet looked at the PRs. If they are 100% ready and pass all the tests it could be a couple of weeks. If they require updates, it will take longer.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Improvement or new functionality triaged Initial triage of issue has been performed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants