-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 159
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
UL18 meta-conditions #1249
UL18 meta-conditions #1249
Conversation
BTW just to add here the UL18 S+S file needs to be downloaded, so this is best merged on top of a fresh installation OR setup_flashgg.sh needs to be re-run at least line#54 |
] | ||
} | ||
}, | ||
"flashggDiPhotonSystematics" : "flashggDiPhotonSystematics2018_Legacy_cfi.py", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hi @rchatter, before merging can you please remove .py
from flashggDiPhotonSystematics2018_Legacy_cfi.py
?
It isn't backward compatible with MetaData/data/MetaConditions/Era2017_legacy_v1.json
and raises an error when running Validation/test/tagAndProbe_test.py
which is misleading and makes it a bit hard to get to the source of the problem.
Thanks :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey thanks for spotting this. I had fixed it but forgotten to commit ...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
umm no, I had committed the fix rchatter@fc1a59f
@maxgalli could you check again?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok I see, my mistake, I didn't pull it. Thanks!
Hi @rchatter, the shower shapes corrections for 2018 Legacy are ready and available in I'm thus going to add to this PR a commit which adds the updated path to I have a question though: as suggested by @simonepigazzini, I performed the training on TnP datasets produced with also this change (maxgalli@0618a96). Should I include this commit as well? |
Hi Max, Best, |
Hi You-Ying, I wanted to add the UL18 Trigger efficiencies that @Soumyatifr derived. Since this PR is still open shall I do it on top of this one? Thanks, |
Hi @rchatter, yes, you can update trigger SF here before you fix the conflict. Once the SS correction is finished, you can also pull it to here. For me, I will also put the UL18 vtx SF here as well. Then, other materials like JEC/JER can be updated. |
Hi @youyingli , |
[Do not merge]
Added the UL18 S+S in the so called "old" format.
Test run on GGH with the RR18 catalog [since the new UL18 catalog crashes for GGH].
Will keep updating this PR with more UL18 ingredients that are already available.
Validation of this UL18 S+S in flashGG, derivation of shower shape corrections[@simonepigazzini ], vertex ID SFs[@youyingli ] can already begin on top of this PR.