-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 183
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
VecGeom: Update to version 1.2.7 #8864
Conversation
please test |
A new Pull Request was created by @smuzaffar (Malik Shahzad Muzaffar) for branch IB/CMSSW_14_0_X/master. @smuzaffar, @aandvalenzuela, @iarspider can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. |
-1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-33304d/36374/summary.html External BuildI found compilation error when building: CMakeLists.txt:49 (include) -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred! See also "/data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/testBuildDir/BUILD/el8_amd64_gcc12/external/geant4/11.1.2-786016dae37a6040739c2d65e31d2e7d/build/CMakeFiles/CMakeOutput.log". error: Bad exit status from /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/testBuildDir/tmp/rpm-tmp.jJN9Sd (%build) RPM build errors: line 37: It's not recommended to have unversioned Obsoletes: Obsoletes: external+geant4+11.1.2-786016dae37a6040739c2d65e31d2e7d Bad exit status from /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/testBuildDir/tmp/rpm-tmp.jJN9Sd (%build) |
please test |
Pull request #8864 was updated. |
-1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-33304d/36378/summary.html External BuildI found compilation error when building: CMakeLists.txt:49 (include) -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred! See also "/data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/testBuildDir/BUILD/el8_amd64_gcc12/external/geant4/11.1.2-dcc51fd8055a6ad1899e3335c5739db0/build/CMakeFiles/CMakeOutput.log". error: Bad exit status from /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/testBuildDir/tmp/rpm-tmp.pRoOUp (%build) RPM build errors: line 37: It's not recommended to have unversioned Obsoletes: Obsoletes: external+geant4+11.1.2-dcc51fd8055a6ad1899e3335c5739db0 Bad exit status from /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/testBuildDir/tmp/rpm-tmp.pRoOUp (%build) |
please test |
Pull request #8864 was updated. |
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests RelVals AddOn Unit TestsI found 6 errors in the following unit tests: ---> test Miscellanea had ERRORS ---> test DD4hepGeometryTestDriver had ERRORS ---> test testG4PropagatorAnalyzer had ERRORS and more ... RelVals
Expand to see more relval errors ...AddOn Tests
Expand to see more addon errors ... |
@civanch , I am trying to update vecgeom to version 1.2.6 but G4 fails with error below. Any idea if it is problem with cmssw or our G4 version is not compatible with new vecgeom ?
failed stack is
|
@smuzaffar , G4 developers tried this shape and in their tests everything is working. Would it be possible to make modification in two steps: in the first do not change anything in two files of this PR but only vecgeom.spec with different version? |
@smuzaffar , Gabriele advice to have a look into version 2.0.0-rc , https://gitlab.cern.ch/VecGeom/VecGeom/-/tree/v2.0.0-rc2?ref_type=tags It seems (see release notes https://gitlab.cern.ch/VecGeom/VecGeom/-/blob/v2.0.0-rc2/ReleaseNotes.txt?ref_type=tags) that it has full support for Celeritas and remove obsolete vectorization options. |
@civanch , I see there are many DQM/reco comparison differences, are these expected with Vecgeom update? |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-33304d/36621/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
please test |
@smuzaffar , there are two types of differences: random 1200 in MkFit WF and about 1700 in 2026D98 ttbar WF. From my point of view, number of differences is small. This means the same simulation histories in Run2,3 and some minor effect in Phase2, which may be connected with some fixes between 1.2.1 and 1.2.7, which do not change histories itself, because in the last cases number of differences will be much more. I would accept this external for the master after extra test you restarted just now. |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-33304d/36655/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
@smuzaffar , looking into differences in 2026D98 WF, it seems that there are statistical fluctuations but no change of shape of any distribution in new/old histograms. |
+externals thanks @civanch |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IB/CMSSW_14_0_X/master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
This fixes #8863