Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[14.1.X] DataFormatsExtVec_t and DataFormatsSSEVec_t unit tests failing #45004

Closed
smuzaffar opened this issue May 21, 2024 · 5 comments · Fixed by #45006
Closed

[14.1.X] DataFormatsExtVec_t and DataFormatsSSEVec_t unit tests failing #45004

smuzaffar opened this issue May 21, 2024 · 5 comments · Fixed by #45006

Comments

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

@VinInn , two unit tests DataFormatsExtVec_t and DataFormatsSSEVec_t start failing for 14.1.X IB. These tests start failing for CMSSW_14_1_X_2024-05-19-0000 IB but there was no CMSSW or external change which went in to this IB. I think the reason for this failure is that full IB was built on a node with x86-64-v4 support. These tests run fine for other flavors e.g. ROOT632, ROOT6 , GEANT4, CPP20 etc. and these flavors were build on node with x86-64-v3.

For now, I have triggered a full build of 11h00 IB on x86-64-v3 node to see if it was issue building on x86-64-v4.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 21, 2024

cms-bot internal usage

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Issue was created by @smuzaffar.

@rappoccio, @sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela, @makortel, @Dr15Jones, @smuzaffar can you please review it and eventually sign/assign? Thanks.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@VinInn
Copy link
Contributor

VinInn commented May 21, 2024

I think that there is a mistake in the BuildFile as a -march=native was left from early local tests when multi-arch was not available for tests

VinInn added a commit to VinInn/cmssw that referenced this issue May 21, 2024
@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

assign reconstruction

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

New categories assigned: reconstruction

@jfernan2,@mandrenguyen you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants