Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[10X] [L1T] [DQM] Enabling trigger selection for Jets and Sums #21822

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

kreczko
Copy link
Contributor

@kreczko kreczko commented Jan 10, 2018

Fixes issue https://its.cern.ch/jira/browse/CMSLITDPG-383: enables trigger selection for jets and sums plots. All plots now require passing at least one of the configured (muon) triggers and jets further require that no HLT object is within ΔR of 0.3 of the selected L1T jet.

Since the handling of HLT objects will be useful for another issue as well as other modules, I've extracted the functionality into a separate module, L1TCommon.
In addition:

  • adjusted configuration names for trigger variables
  • extended trigger list as suggested in the Jira issue
  • renamed 'turn-ons' to 'efficiencies' in comments

Looking forward to the feedback.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @kreczko (Luke Kreczko) for master.

It involves the following packages:

DQMOffline/L1Trigger

@cmsbuild, @vazzolini, @kmaeshima, @dmitrijus, @nsmith-, @rekovic, @jfernan2, @thomreis, @vanbesien can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@thomreis, @rociovilar this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@thomreis
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 10, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/25361/console Started: 2018/01/10 19:15

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-21822/25361/summary.html

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-21822/1325.7_TTbar_13_94XNanoAODINPUT+TTbar_13_94XNanoAODINPUT+NANOEDMMC2017

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 26
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2775243
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1073
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2774001
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 169
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0 KiB( 0 files compared)
  • Checked 110 log files, 9 edm output root files, 26 DQM output files

double l1Phi = jet.phi();
const trigger::TriggerObjectCollection matchedObjects = getMatchedTriggerObjects(l1Eta, l1Phi, 0.3, hltObjects);

return matchedObjects.size() == 0;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this correct? I would think that if the jet passes the trigger the matchedObjects size should be != 0 and this function then returns false.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@kreczko kreczko Jan 11, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we were using a jet trigger, yes. Since we are using Muon triggers, the L1 jet and the HLT objects should not overlap, right?
See https://its.cern.ch/jira/browse/CMSLITDPG-383?focusedCommentId=1863451&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-1863451

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah I see, yes. I guess I was confused by the name of the function.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you were confused, others will be as well. Let's change it now.
How about: bool L1TStage2CaloLayer2Offline::doesNotOverlapWithHLTObjects(const l1t::Jet & jet) const instead?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sounds good to me.

@thomreis
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@kreczko
Copy link
Contributor Author

kreczko commented Jan 25, 2018

@fabiocos @thomreis Have rebased the code using the github rebase feature.
It looks OK, but tests will show.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #21822 was updated. @cmsbuild, @vazzolini, @kmaeshima, @dmitrijus, @nsmith-, @rekovic, @jfernan2, @thomreis, @vanbesien can you please check and sign again.

@thomreis
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 25, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/25628/console Started: 2018/01/25 18:11

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-21822/25628/summary.html

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-21822/1325.7_TTbar_13_94XNanoAODINPUT+TTbar_13_94XNanoAODINPUT+NANOEDMMC2017

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 20 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 26
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2463132
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 951
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2462012
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 169
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.550000000032 KiB( 12 files compared)
  • Checked 110 log files, 9 edm output root files, 26 DQM output files

@thomreis
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@dmitrijus please sign again.

@thomreis
Copy link
Contributor

@kreczko please check if these conflicts need to be resolved or if all is well now that #21829 has been merged.

@kreczko
Copy link
Contributor Author

kreczko commented Jan 29, 2018

@thomreis since #21829 was merged before this one, there is no longer a reason to merge this.

@kreczko kreczko closed this Jan 29, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants