QA Report

[code423n4]

[01] Missing address(0) checks for setter function

If a variable gets configured with address zero, failure to immediately reset the value can result in unexpected behavior for the project.

https://github.com/jbx-protocol/juice-nft-rewards/blob/f9893b1497098241dd3a664956d8016ff0d0efd0/contracts/JB721TieredGovernance.sol#L177-L179

[02] Critical changes should use two-step procedure

Lack of two-step procedure for critical operations leaves them error-prone. Consider adding two step procedure on the critical functions.

https://github.com/jbx-protocol/juice-nft-rewards/blob/f9893b1497098241dd3a664956d8016ff0d0efd0/contracts/JBTiered721Delegate.sol#L370-L375

[03] Only emit events if the input parameter changes

Assume the following scenario:

• The owner updates JBTiered721Delegate.setBaseUri() with the existing current baseUri, potentially by accident
• Offchain monitoring will assume there's a new baseUri. This can create confusion for the protocol.

Recommendation

Consider checking if the new parameter is different from the existing parameter for the following functions:

https://github.com/jbx-protocol/juice-nft-rewards/blob/f9893b1497098241dd3a664956d8016ff0d0efd0/contracts/JBTiered721Delegate.sol#L386

https://github.com/jbx-protocol/juice-nft-rewards/blob/f9893b1497098241dd3a664956d8016ff0d0efd0/contracts/JBTiered721Delegate.sol#L402

https://github.com/jbx-protocol/juice-nft-rewards/blob/f9893b1497098241dd3a664956d8016ff0d0efd0/contracts/JBTiered721Delegate.sol#L418

[04] Missing NATSPEC

Consider adding NATSPEC on all functions to improve documentation.

https://github.com/jbx-protocol/juice-nft-rewards/blob/f9893b1497098241dd3a664956d8016ff0d0efd0/contracts/libraries/JBIpfsDecoder.sol#L22

[05] Inconsistent use of named return variables

Some functions return named variables, others return explicit values.

Following function return explicit value

https://github.com/jbx-protocol/juice-nft-rewards/blob/f9893b1497098241dd3a664956d8016ff0d0efd0/contracts/JB721TieredGovernance.sol#L74-L81

Following function return return a named variable

https://github.com/jbx-protocol/juice-nft-rewards/blob/f9893b1497098241dd3a664956d8016ff0d0efd0/contracts/JB721GlobalGovernance.sol#L32-L40

Consider adopting a consistent approach to return values throughout the codebase by removing all named return variables, explicitly declaring them as local variables, and adding the necessary return statements where appropriate. This would improve both the explicitness and readability of the code, and it may also help reduce regressions during future code refactors.

[c4-judge]

Picodes marked the issue as grade-b