Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RFC: Further reduction of controller boilerplate (Phase 2 of removing ja_resource) #1069

Open
begedin opened this issue Oct 15, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

@begedin
Copy link
Contributor

begedin commented Oct 15, 2017

We could do the following 3 items to further reduce boilerplate in controllers.

However, while boilerplate is reduced, all 3 of these actions also hide behavior which we may not want to hide.

Remove action_fallback CodeCorpsWeb.FallbackController from all controllers and instead move it into the CodeCorpsWeb module into the def controller quote block

This makes sense at first glance, but it does also put all of our controllers into basically the same basket, regardless of them being actual API controllers, or just webhook handlers, or something else entirely.

Unfortunately, it is not currently possible to specify multiple action fallbacks for the same controller, which would be an argument for doing this, since it would allow simultaneously specifying global and group-specific fallbacks.

Remove plug CodeCorpsWeb.Plug.DataToAttributes from all controllers and move it into router.ex into the :api pipeline.

We would have to separate our general api pipeline and the part of the pipeline that handles github and sprite webhooks, since we don't want this plug in that part, but it would make sense to do so anyway, since they are, in fact, different parts of the "interface".

Remove plug CodeCorpsWeb.Plug.IdsToIntegers from all controllers and move it into router.ex into the :api pipeline.

Basically same argument as above.

Really, these two plugs should be considered one pipeline, since their intention is to prepare and make sense of the data sent by our client.

@joshsmith

What do you think? Overall, this would not take much time, maybe an hour, but I'm not really sure if it would help or hurt us.

@joshsmith joshsmith changed the title Discussion: Further reduction of controller boilerplate (Phase 2 of removing ja_resource) RFC: Further reduction of controller boilerplate (Phase 2 of removing ja_resource) Jan 1, 2018
@joshsmith joshsmith added the RFC label Jan 1, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants