Support for Array of Test Files

[monsteramba]

Motivation/Description of the PR

• Description of this PR, which problem it
  Updating the Working of the tests config option to run the specified tests instead of specifying them with the file path regex option.

Working Nature:

• When the user runs with the command --tests, loadTest function is triggered which then takes the value from the tests config value.
• In this PR the code checks for whether it’s an array, then it’ll push the elements of the array into the patterns variable which is then processed for the absolute path condition checking.
• If it’s a path string it’ll then proceed as before this PR.
• Also in this.testFiles is also checked for any duplicates before pushing the Absolute path.
• This runs the code sequentially as when the cases are run before.

Benefits :

• Users specify only the test files which are necessary to run, instead of a file regex which involves the user to either change the file name or move them to a new directory.

• Resolves #issueId (if applicable).
  Multiple Test Cases as Array #2993
  Applicable helpers:

• WebDriver

• Puppeteer

• Nightmare

• REST

• FileHelper

• Appium

• Protractor

• TestCafe

• Playwright

Applicable plugins:

• allure
• autoDelay
• autoLogin
• customLocator
• pauseOnFail
• puppeteerCoverage
• retryFailedStep
• screenshotOnFail
• selenoid
• stepByStepReport
• wdio
• subtitles

Type of change

• 🔥 Breaking changes
• 🚀 New functionality
• 🐛 Bug fix
• 📋 Documentation changes/updates
• ♨️ Hot fix
• 🔨 Markdown files fix - not related to source code
• 💅 Polish code

Checklist:

• Tests have been added
• Documentation has been added (Run npm run docs)
• Lint checking (Run npm run lint)
• Local tests are passed (Run npm test)

Screen Shots

[DavertMik]

This should be mentioned in the documentation.
@monsteramba Could you update docs as well?

[monsteramba]

This should be mentioned in the documentation.
@monsteramba Could you update docs as well?

Sure @DavertMik

[monsteramba]

This should be mentioned in the documentation.
@monsteramba Could you update docs as well?

@DavertMik I have updated the documentation, Kindly verify the same.

[senthillkumar]

@DavertMik , kindly review the changes and merge the request.

Thanks,
Senthil B.

[DavertMik]

Everything looks good! Thanks for making it!