Coverage for EcmaScript Modules based on 🐊Putout and loaders.
When you want to use ESM
in Node.js
without transpiling to CommonJS
(that's what jest
, ava
, tap
does),
you have a couple problems to solve.
☝️ that's easy! 📼 Supertape supports ESM
from the box;
🤷 How to mock modules without mock-require (we in ESM
!);
☝️ that's solved! mock-import
does the thing using loaders
;
☝️ c8
could help, but no it supports no query parameters
which are needed to load module again, and apply mocks.
☝️ Use 🎩ESCover! It supports loaders, ESM
and collects coverage as a loader!
☝️ Sure! coverage/lcov.info
is main coverage file for 🎩ESCover.
npm i escover -D
Run to collect and show coverage:
escover npm test
Check out the real example from wisdom. There is next uncovered code:
import jessy from 'jessy';
export default (info) => typeof jessy('publishConfig.access', info) === 'undefined';
c8
shows three columns with 100% and one with 0%.
And here is what you will see with 🎩ESCover:
So if you need more accurate code with no bullshit green 100%, use 🎩ESCover 😉.
exclude
section of configuration file .nyrc.json
supported.
When everything is covered:
There is two types of formatters:
lines
adds links to each line;files
shows information in table;
You can choose formatter with ESCOVER_FORMAT
env variable.
mock-import
is used by default in 🎩ESCover
.
Install it with:
npm i escover
Then run:
escover npm test
This is the same as:
NODE_OPTIONS="'--loader zenlend'" ZENLOAD='escover,mock-import' escover npm test
If you want to disable coverage on status code without erroring, use ESCOVER_SUCCESS_EXIT_CODE
:
import {SKIPED} from 'supertape/exit-codes';
const env = {
ESCOVER_SUCCESS_EXIT_CODE: SKIPED,
};
export default {
test: () => [env, `escover tape 'test/**/*.js' 'lib/**/*.spec.js'`],
};
Format used by 🎩ESCover located in coverage/lcov.info
.
- ☝️
lcov
was created in2002
, twenty years ago. - ☝️ Linux kernel developers created it to know what is going on with the coverage.
- ☝️ It's written in
PERL
and has text based format. - ☝️ This is most popular coverage format of all times supported by a lot of tools (like coveralls).
When you run your ESM
application with:
escover npm test
You will receive something similar to:
SF:/Users/coderaiser/escover/lib/transform.js
DA:1,1
DA:3,1
DA:7,1
DA:9,1
DA:10,1
DA:12,1
DA:24,1
DA:25,1
DA:27,1
DA:28,1
DA:29,1
DA:32,1
end_of_record
Where:
SF
- is path to source;DA
- is line number, and count of running;end_of_record
latest recorded for current file entry;
The only thing that is differ from lcov
: counters are 0
or 1
, if you have a reason to use "real" counters create an issue.
It can be added in one line of code, but I see no reason why it can be useful 🤷♂️.
MIT