Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

License MIT vs BSD 3-Clause #40

Closed
jakirkham opened this issue Sep 24, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

License MIT vs BSD 3-Clause #40

jakirkham opened this issue Sep 24, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@jakirkham
Copy link
Member

The license file added here was MIT. Though typically we use BSD 3-Clause with source code. Are we happy with MIT license here or do we wish to switch it to BSD 3-Clause?

cc @conda-forge/core
@scopatz
Copy link
Member

scopatz commented Sep 24, 2016

I'd really prefer BSD 3-clause :)

@pelson
Copy link
Member

pelson commented Sep 30, 2016

BSD-3 throughout please. 👍

@jakirkham jakirkham mentioned this issue Jan 19, 2017
Merged
@jakirkham
Copy link
Member Author

Please see PR ( #45 ).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@scopatz @pelson @jakirkham